From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16040 invoked by uid 1002); 29 Apr 2003 13:38:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20976 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2003 13:38:43 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:38:42 +0200 From: Fredrik Jagenheim To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030429133842.GF21154@pobox.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20030429001443.GA413@time> <20030429011644.GB18711@lucien.dreaming> <20030429033239.GB413@time> <200304290224.53881.novas007@gmx.net> <1051598177.1819.32.camel@bunyip.uwa.edu.au> <20030429130521.GD18711@lucien.dreaming> <20030429131213.GE21154@pobox.com> <20030429131828.GE18711@lucien.dreaming> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20030429131828.GE18711@lucien.dreaming> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: Fredrik Jagenheim Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new local USE var: vim-with-x X-Archives-Salt: 233cc8ca-8d11-4ae5-92c0-3709b54a7530 X-Archives-Hash: a2d1b17e0d0b0ea319a55f7e5cff069e On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 03:18:28PM +0200, Björn Lindström wrote: > Fredrik Jagenheim [20030429 15:12]: > > But, vim with X is NOT the same as (g|k)vim. The latter is a graphical > > GUI while the former is a terminalbased, but has X hooks. > > If that is what you think, you should advocate gvim/kvim as separate > packages, not introducing some new weird USE flag. Huh? They are separate packages... And, did you even read what I wrote? Like the part where I mentioned a better solution than the weird USE flag. //H -- To segfault is human; to bluescreen moronic. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list