From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12978 invoked by uid 1002); 22 Apr 2003 16:14:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20188 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2003 16:14:32 -0000 From: Tony Clark To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:14:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <1050997108.2986.28.camel@amd.vsen.dk> <200304221557.42803.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> <1051027209.2986.81.camel@amd.vsen.dk> In-Reply-To: <1051027209.2986.81.camel@amd.vsen.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304221814.31739.tclark@telia.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuilds not getting in :( X-Archives-Salt: fdfd5b28-de6b-4dee-9318-41914890560f X-Archives-Hash: f754a3e06dc0ab0a3fc149890cbed0ce =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 22 April 2003 18.00, Klavs Klavsen wrote: > On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 16:57, Peter Ruskin wrote: > > On Tuesday 22 Apr 2003 15:26, Dan Armak wrote: > > > The second will facilitate quick acceptance of user-submitted ebuilds > > > in some way - probably drawing upon the submitters in one way or > > > another. > > > > I'm more than willing to maintain ebuilds I submit. > > Same here. What are the requirements for being a maintainer? > I don't think one has to make the newest version available ASAP. > This f.ex. didn't happen with drip - which was why I created a new > version myself. > > I think people who submit ebuilds should automacally be added as > maintainer of the ebuild. If they contribute with a newer version of a > given ebuild - then they should be added as maintainer - keeping the old > maintainer too. Not too sure I agree with this. You need people to take some sort of=20 ownership of the problem. If things don't get done then you can look at=20 replacing them. > > It's a Community distro and I don't think anyone will mind - as long as > it's all build on volutarity - ie. make a newer version if you like - > don't if you don't. You would be surprised. I lot of ppl take a lot of pride in what they do a= nd=20 would feel very walked over if someone was just added to maintain a package= =20 because they where on, say holidays for a week and a new release came out. tony =2D --=20 Contract ASIC and FPGA design. Telephone +46 702 894 667 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dvindex&search=3D0x633E2623 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBPqVqZ2kjRGZD9pCjAQK7EQQAnOEVIBrKSZm2HiXMgb6xsev/VnUY7X3o /eWQO0KIiqmtvpQCH9bmd1LEu+UjFpC93rGTmrM/tK4LA4QoKHNC/gV/uhh7yNGf MCvRqJ30cMK/qJgjBhe7C7NE59eWJ2MF4OQsQK6G3YvtjIZq9SJt1z3mBw6VS/zz IEzSXymeOl8=3D =3D6XyB =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list