From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2932 invoked by uid 1002); 22 Apr 2003 17:55:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27713 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2003 17:55:57 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:55:56 -0500 From: Mark Bainter To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030422175556.GM2114@firinn.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <1050997108.2986.28.camel@amd.vsen.dk> <1051016369.4102.46.camel@entropy> <200304221726.35741.danarmak@gentoo.org> <200304221557.42803.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> <1051027209.2986.81.camel@amd.vsen.dk> <20030422165933.GB7131@cerberus.oppresses.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030422165933.GB7131@cerberus.oppresses.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.19-gentoo-r10 on a i586 X-PGP-Fingerprint: CF87 F5AA 26AB 9FA2 BBF3 90D0 0DD1 D14C B2DF AD43 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuilds not getting in :( X-Archives-Salt: c3268168-96f8-4e6d-acff-442a7b75348c X-Archives-Hash: 0f3b121360681b7c5f35be9503bd5d39 Jon Portnoy [avenj@gentoo.org] wrote: > The problem is that we can't just give everyone who submits an ebuild or > two commit access. > > We are, however, stepping up recruiting somewhat with a recruiting email > address. There are also ideas floating around for ways to make it easier > for users to get ebuilds into the tree quicker. I don't disagree with this. You might consider letting them still be a maintainer though, and just have people who are new maintainers pass their changes through a more seasoned member of the community until they have a few releases under their belt, or whatever criteria the devs think demonstrates the level of trust necessary to give them commit access to their ebuilds. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list