From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26910 invoked by uid 1002); 19 Apr 2003 18:39:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19056 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2003 18:39:59 -0000 From: Dan Armak Reply-To: danarmak@gentoo.org Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 21:40:19 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200304181411.49407.danarmak@gentoo.org> <20030419195055.2a505862.acid.punk@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20030419195055.2a505862.acid.punk@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_DJco+9+SlsBWIVs"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200304192140.19673.danarmak@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New cvs.eclass X-Archives-Salt: a43ee26e-bcb7-43c9-9b9d-71b34b7c61f5 X-Archives-Hash: a0df9175f27b5f462d5c3c9687f281b8 --Boundary-02=_DJco+9+SlsBWIVs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 19 April 2003 17:50, Alexander Futasz wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:11:48 +0000, Dan Armak wrote: > > I've rewritten cvs.eclass. I'll test all cvs euilds once again now and > > then commit the new eclass and ebuilds if noone objects. Extra testing > > from anyone else welcome. >=20 > > - ECVS_RUNAS, running everything under su to a specified user, does > > not work. I am not sure how well it worked before. In any case it is > > impossible to do in portage's userpriv mode AFAIK, unless the > > administrator gave the portage user the right to su or sudo to that > > user without benig prompted for a password. I may implement this again > > before committing, mostly for non-userpriv mode (especially if people > > ask me to ;-). >=20 > Does that mean ebuilds using the cvs.eclass wont work with userpriv and > usersandbox? No, it only means the special ECVS_RUNAS feature doesn't work with userpriv= =2E=20 This isn't a feature ebuilds use, it's something you can use to make=20 cvs.eclass chown its checked-out files to the user specified via $ECVS_RUNA= S.=20 If you don't use it, you don't need to worry. Again, this didn't really work before either, it's just the the eclass clai= med=20 it to work :-) =2D-=20 Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Matan, Israel Public GPG key: http://cvs.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key --Boundary-02=_DJco+9+SlsBWIVs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+ocJDUI2RQ41fiVERAl0+AJ9rittpU65IiyNTXBtXm/wbhKnFZgCfYQce iTNIXSyP627Sc2JP1MuRMXQ= =xliu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_DJco+9+SlsBWIVs--