From: "C. Brewer" <cbrewer@stealthaccess.net>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GUI installer
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 20:05:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030419200535.3827b890.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200304192250.54658.powers.161@osu.edu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1452 bytes --]
On Sat, 19 Apr 2003 22:50:54 -0400
Evan Powers <powers.161@osu.edu> wrote:
> 3) The install is probably the only thing in Gentoo someone slightly more
> skilled than necessary to admin a Red Hat install wouldn't be capable of. If
> that's true, why shouldn't we remove that barrier to entry? The point of
> Gentoo is not the elite nature of its current user base. It's the technology
> behind it. If we can give more classes of user access to our technology, why
> shouldn't we?
I'm all for this example. the reek of elitism has become pretty high on this list IMHO, with the snubbing of ideas, blowing off of peoples suggestions to improve this distro, the tendency to snap at people and slight them for their opinions seems to have become pretty commonplace here. Just because we don't write code for a living or have some dev-type email addy doesn't make any one of us less busy or less important, or less able to contribute. Besides, If I was looking for any of these things in a group of people on a ML, the already exist..they're just prefixed debian-* :)
p.s.- I like the gentoo-user list, everyones grandma is trying to learn linux, which is what we all bitch about not enough of happening, and hell, when we already know the answers, it provides comedy and a good sense of community. So I say, bring on yer grandma!:P
--
Chuck Brewer
Registered Linux User #284015
Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-20 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-11 23:04 [gentoo-dev] GUI installer Jeff Rose
2003-04-11 23:25 ` Riyad Kalla
2003-04-12 0:05 ` Alec Berryman
2003-04-12 2:19 ` Brian Harring
2003-04-12 3:52 ` George Shapovalov
2003-04-13 5:05 ` Justin Whitney
2003-04-13 5:38 ` Derek J. Belrose
2003-04-13 6:50 ` Cliff Free
2003-04-13 7:08 ` Derek J. Belrose
2003-04-13 8:49 ` Jeff Rose
2003-04-13 9:14 ` Derek J. Belrose
2003-04-13 9:23 ` Cedric Veilleux
2003-04-13 9:30 ` Derek J. Belrose
2003-04-13 9:34 ` Brian Harring
2003-04-13 9:47 ` Derek J. Belrose
2003-04-13 13:55 ` Cliff Free
2003-04-18 9:35 ` Mark Bainter
2003-04-18 14:54 ` Jeff Rose
2003-04-19 3:45 ` Abhishek Amit
2003-04-20 2:50 ` Evan Powers
2003-04-20 3:05 ` C. Brewer [this message]
2003-04-13 16:33 ` Alain Penders
2003-04-13 20:04 ` Jeff Rose
2003-04-13 20:09 ` Graham Forest
2003-04-13 20:36 ` Derek J. Belrose
2003-04-13 22:26 ` Cliff Free
2003-04-13 22:33 ` Derek J. Belrose
2003-04-13 23:13 ` Alec Berryman
2003-04-15 14:26 ` DJ Cozatt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-14 10:18 Stroller
2003-04-14 13:17 ` William Hubbs
2003-04-15 4:06 ` John Nilsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030419200535.3827b890.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net \
--to=cbrewer@stealthaccess.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox