From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10537 invoked by uid 1002); 19 Apr 2003 17:48:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 31054 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2003 17:48:27 -0000 Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 19:50:55 +0200 From: Alexander Futasz To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030419195055.2a505862.acid.punk@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200304181411.49407.danarmak@gentoo.org> References: <200304181411.49407.danarmak@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New cvs.eclass X-Archives-Salt: dc92fc8f-afce-40b5-95a7-6ce9834b8b86 X-Archives-Hash: 9c4778f4d70db4c41d2777f4ed8a3c36 On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:11:48 +0000, Dan Armak wrote: > I've rewritten cvs.eclass. I'll test all cvs euilds once again now and > then commit the new eclass and ebuilds if noone objects. Extra testing > from anyone else welcome. > - ECVS_RUNAS, running everything under su to a specified user, does > not work. I am not sure how well it worked before. In any case it is > impossible to do in portage's userpriv mode AFAIK, unless the > administrator gave the portage user the right to su or sudo to that > user without benig prompted for a password. I may implement this again > before committing, mostly for non-userpriv mode (especially if people > ask me to ;-). Does that mean ebuilds using the cvs.eclass wont work with userpriv and usersandbox? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list