From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11483 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Apr 2003 15:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 29253 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2003 15:37:27 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:37:24 -0500 From: Peter Fein To: Daniel Armyr Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030414103724.1e485f4f.pfein@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <3E9AD163.308@home.se> References: <3E9AD163.308@home.se> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-solaris2.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel compiling respecting CFLAGS X-Archives-Salt: f618983c-0c62-4ac6-bded-f40ac69ddd7e X-Archives-Hash: a939c1a3b31cb1725f5571f9558fa482 On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:18:59 +0800 Daniel Armyr wrote: > After quite a few compiles, It seems to me that the compilation of > kernels does not respect CFPAGS or CXXFLAGS settings. Is this true? If > so, is there a reason besides "If people compile the kernel with the > optimizations they want, their kernel will be mangled into oblivion."? La la la .... http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=24849 -- Peter Fein pfein@pobox.com 773-575-0694 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list