From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16464 invoked by uid 1002); 12 Apr 2003 20:28:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19185 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2003 20:28:05 -0000 From: Brian Jackson To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 15:24:19 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <1050174571.1279.17.camel@blafasel> In-Reply-To: <1050174571.1279.17.camel@blafasel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304121524.19816.brian@mdrx.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Performance once again.. X-Archives-Salt: 343845e5-1ee0-4551-82ca-cb313a12a4a9 X-Archives-Hash: f4e20b90d373cd0827ab6170e6b78b27 I think I've got to agree with Jon on this one, without more info, it looks like an Apache/Apache config issue. --Brian On Saturday 12 April 2003 02:09 pm, Benjamin Podszun wrote: > Hi there. > I switched to Gentoo on two of my servers recently. Before that I used > Debian stable with a 2.4.18-Kernel. > Right now the machines are nearly useless. They should serve lots of > pages, but every ~24h everything freezes without any load on the > machines.. The load drops to 0.01 and nothing is delivered. > Only a restart of apache resets this timeframe again. > Well, after searching for a solution for about 3-4 days I'm already in > the mood to wipe Gentoo, install Debian again and stay with Gentoo for > Desktop only.. > If anyone has any suggestions I'd be glad to give them a try, but I > cannot afford to have two systems down on a regular basis for more than > 2-3 days.. > > I installed 1.4, used the 2.4.20 vanilla-kernel and I installed nothing > special but exim and apache/php. > All of them use the most current ebuilds in the x86 portage-tree. > I wonder if this is related to the problems someone pointed out with the > select() performance? But it would be a vanilla-problem then? > > TIA for any suggestions, > Ben -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list