From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30388 invoked by uid 1002); 11 Apr 2003 20:50:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21285 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2003 20:50:50 -0000 From: Bernhard Bock To: Paul de Vrieze Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 22:51:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200304091523.37574.gentoo-user@devrieze.net> <200304110049.33436.danarmak@gentoo.org> <200304111016.33850.gentoo-user@devrieze.net> In-Reply-To: <200304111016.33850.gentoo-user@devrieze.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Dan Armak , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200304112251.08741.bb-mailinglists@gmx.net> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Request for comments/testers X-Archives-Salt: 0a803eab-0e17-48fc-b5a4-9bbd49e3245d X-Archives-Hash: 49a8c2239e0a94fb8216b13342afb359 On Friday 11 April 2003 10:16, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > That's why it is a request for comments. I know it are patches to rather > central parts, and (except for the newpg patch) they are only useful when > used together. I basically made the patches myself because I felt there is > a need for this kind of feature, and there had not been real reactions on > my suggestions. I tested the patch and the ebuilds here on my workstation. Works like a charm! I also tested the concept with the ssh-agent (one-liner bash script in /etc/X11/presession.d). As everyone would expect, also works great. I'd vote for using this patches, as they are quite intuitive to use, and IMHO consistent with "the gentoo way". regards Bernhard -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list