[gentoo-dev] gentoo-stats and stats.gentoo.org

[gentoo-dev] gentoo-stats and stats.gentoo.org

[Dhruba Bandopadhyay]

Hello,

Recently, I've noticed that stats.gentoo.org is in pitiful shape and that
there has been a call for devs to maintain it.  Bearing this in mind
shouldn't the section on installing gentoo-stats be removed from the
installation documentation?

What is happening to the data that is submitted everytime a user does
gentoo-stats --update?  And what would you prefer was done with that data?
 In my perspective, this data is immensely important being profiles of
users and should not be treated lightly.  I'd be interested to hear your
thoughts.

Many thanks



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-stats and stats.gentoo.org

[Alec Berryman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1012 bytes --]

On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 16:11, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Recently, I've noticed that stats.gentoo.org is in pitiful shape and that
> there has been a call for devs to maintain it.  Bearing this in mind
> shouldn't the section on installing gentoo-stats be removed from the
> installation documentation?

> What is happening to the data that is submitted everytime a user does
> gentoo-stats --update?  And what would you prefer was done with that data?
>  In my perspective, this data is immensely important being profiles of
> users and should not be treated lightly.  I'd be interested to hear your
> thoughts.

Quick plug: for anyone interested, please see bug 12785
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12785) about combining
gentoo-stats with gentoo-stable.  I don't have the PHP skills to do it,
but if someone would take this up it would speed up the move from ~ARCH
to ARCH.

-- 

Alec Berryman <alec@lorax.wox.org>
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key DFB366F2

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-stats and stats.gentoo.org

[Meir Kriheli]

On Tuesday 08 April 2003 00:22, Alec Berryman wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 16:11, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Recently, I've noticed that stats.gentoo.org is in pitiful shape and that
> > there has been a call for devs to maintain it.  Bearing this in mind
> > shouldn't the section on installing gentoo-stats be removed from the
> > installation documentation?
> >
> > What is happening to the data that is submitted everytime a user does
> > gentoo-stats --update?  And what would you prefer was done with that
> > data? In my perspective, this data is immensely important being profiles
> > of users and should not be treated lightly.  I'd be interested to hear
> > your thoughts.
>
> Quick plug: for anyone interested, please see bug 12785
> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12785) about combining
> gentoo-stats with gentoo-stable.  I don't have the PHP skills to do it,
> but if someone would take this up it would speed up the move from ~ARCH
> to ARCH.

I have PHP skills to handle it, whom should I contact  (assuming it is not too 
time consuming) ?  Seemant Kulleen ?
-- 
Meir Kriheli
MKsoft systems

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-stats and stats.gentoo.org

[Abhishek Amit]

On 01:24 Tue 08 Apr     , Meir Kriheli wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2003 00:22, Alec Berryman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 16:11, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Recently, I've noticed that stats.gentoo.org is in pitiful shape and that
> > > there has been a call for devs to maintain it.  Bearing this in mind
> > > shouldn't the section on installing gentoo-stats be removed from the
> > > installation documentation?
> > >
> > > What is happening to the data that is submitted everytime a user does
> > > gentoo-stats --update?  And what would you prefer was done with that
> > > data? In my perspective, this data is immensely important being profiles
> > > of users and should not be treated lightly.  I'd be interested to hear
> > > your thoughts.
> >
> > Quick plug: for anyone interested, please see bug 12785
> > (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12785) about combining
> > gentoo-stats with gentoo-stable.  I don't have the PHP skills to do it,
> > but if someone would take this up it would speed up the move from ~ARCH
> > to ARCH.
> 
> I have PHP skills to handle it, whom should I contact  (assuming it is not too 
> time consuming) ?  Seemant Kulleen ?
> -- 
> Meir Kriheli
> MKsoft systems
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
Yeah I think so. Last week he had a message about a call for devs and
maintianing these projects was one of the things he mentioned.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-stats and stats.gentoo.org

[Zach Welch]

Abhishek Amit wrote:
 > On 01:24 Tue 08 Apr     , Meir Kriheli wrote:
 >> On Tuesday 08 April 2003 00:22, Alec Berryman wrote:
 >>> On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 16:11, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote
 >>>>
 >>>> Recently, I've noticed that stats.gentoo.org is in pitiful
 >>>> shape and that there has been a call for devs to maintain it.
 >>>> Bearing this in mind shouldn't the section on installing
 >>>> gentoo-stats be removed from the installation documentation?
 >>>>
 >>>
 >>> Quick plug: for anyone interested, please see bug 12785
 >>> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12785) about combining
 >>> gentoo-stats with gentoo-stable.  I don't have the PHP skills to
 >>> do it, but if someone would take this up it would speed up the
 >>> move from ~ARCH to ARCH.

For those interested, I am also developing a project idea, code named
"Udder", that could also leverage the gentoo-stable and gentoo-stats
sites.  In addition to expanding Gentoo's "groupware" facilities, it
aims to provide tighter integration for all of the existing services:

http://cvs.gentoo.org/~zwelch/groupware.html

Let me know if I'm headed in the right direction.

Cheers,

Zach Welch
Gentoo Developer
Superlucidity Services


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-stats and stats.gentoo.org

[Meir Kriheli]

On Tuesday 08 April 2003 01:41, Abhishek Amit wrote:
> On 01:24 Tue 08 Apr     , Meir Kriheli wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 April 2003 00:22, Alec Berryman wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 16:11, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Recently, I've noticed that stats.gentoo.org is in pitiful shape and
> > > > that there has been a call for devs to maintain it.  Bearing this in
> > > > mind shouldn't the section on installing gentoo-stats be removed from
> > > > the installation documentation?
> > > >
> > > > What is happening to the data that is submitted everytime a user does
> > > > gentoo-stats --update?  And what would you prefer was done with that
> > > > data? In my perspective, this data is immensely important being
> > > > profiles of users and should not be treated lightly.  I'd be
> > > > interested to hear your thoughts.
> > >
> > > Quick plug: for anyone interested, please see bug 12785
> > > (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12785) about combining
> > > gentoo-stats with gentoo-stable.  I don't have the PHP skills to do it,
> > > but if someone would take this up it would speed up the move from ~ARCH
> > > to ARCH.
> >
> > I have PHP skills to handle it, whom should I contact  (assuming it is
> > not too time consuming) ?  Seemant Kulleen ?
> > --
> > Meir Kriheli
> > MKsoft systems
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
> Yeah I think so. Last week he had a message about a call for devs and
> maintianing these projects was one of the things he mentioned.

Hmm, I've mailed him a couple of days ago, no reply. Strange

-- 
Meir Kriheli
MKsoft systems

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-stats and stats.gentoo.org

[Alec Berryman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 572 bytes --]

On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 18:31, Meir Kriheli wrote:
> > > I have PHP skills to handle it, whom should I contact  (assuming it is
> > > not too time consuming) ?  Seemant Kulleen ?
> >
> > Yeah I think so. Last week he had a message about a call for devs and
> > maintianing these projects was one of the things he mentioned.
> 
> Hmm, I've mailed him a couple of days ago, no reply. Strange

I haven't gotten one, either - he's probably busy.  Guess that's a good
sign!

-- 

Alec Berryman <alec@lorax.wox.org>
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key DFB366F2

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]