From: Cedric Veilleux <cedric@neopeak.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary release of gentoo
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 04:29:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304100429.01001.cedric@neopeak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200304100003.57256.robert.cole@support4linux.com>
> > I thought it was called Debian? ;o)
> >
> > Or perhaps, "I'd eat meat, if only it were vegetarian"
> >
> > Seriously though, I don't see the point, unless you want to sell more
> > T-Shirts, there are a plethora of good binary distributions of linux out
> > there already and all the downsides you list are what, imo, define
> > Gentoo.
> >
> > I'd prefer to see gentoo improved as a source-based distribution
>
> Ditto. There is no point to a binary version of Gentoo. If you want that
> then as Michael said just use Debian.
I don't agree. Gentoo already supports binary packages anyways (emerge -b /
emerge -k). We're only talking about improving it AFAIK.. What's wrong with
improving some features of portage if it's possible and if it won't hurt
anyone?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-10 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-10 0:13 [gentoo-dev] Binary release of gentoo Noah Justin Norris
2003-04-10 6:28 ` leahcim
2003-04-10 7:03 ` Robert Cole
2003-04-10 8:29 ` Cedric Veilleux [this message]
2003-04-10 8:29 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-04-10 8:55 ` leahcim
2003-04-10 9:07 ` Henti Smith
2003-04-10 9:41 ` Spider
2003-04-10 9:49 ` Henti Smith
2003-04-10 16:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Simons
2003-04-11 8:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Miles Egan
2003-04-11 2:01 ` DJ Cozatt
2003-04-11 14:43 ` Dan Armak
2003-04-11 16:11 ` Jon Kent
2003-04-10 10:54 ` Noah Justin Norris
2003-04-10 7:27 ` Spider
2003-04-10 8:13 ` Cedric Veilleux
2003-04-10 8:45 ` Spider
2003-04-11 8:16 ` Miles Egan
2003-04-10 15:52 ` Robin H.Johnson
2003-04-10 18:57 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-04-11 0:51 ` Spider
2003-04-10 8:08 ` Dylan Carlson
2003-04-10 18:50 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-04-10 19:34 ` Dan Armak
2003-04-10 21:54 ` Mark Farver
2003-04-10 22:17 ` Dan Armak
2003-04-10 23:01 ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-04-11 1:55 ` Terje Kvernes
2003-04-11 14:42 ` Dan Armak
2003-04-11 10:17 ` Noah Justin Norris
2003-04-11 5:48 ` C. Brewer
2003-04-11 4:20 ` John White
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200304100429.01001.cedric@neopeak.com \
--to=cedric@neopeak.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox