From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30032 invoked by uid 1002); 27 Mar 2003 13:00:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 692 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2003 13:00:39 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:00:38 +0000 To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030327130038.GA5361@mars.leahcim.invalid> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200303260057.43296.wigren@home.se> <20030326232820.GA9138@datalap.aamit.com> <200303270620.57138.wigren@home.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303270620.57138.wigren@home.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i From: leahcim@ntlworld.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Renaming ebuilds... X-Archives-Salt: a4ec3692-7720-44ff-93a5-90598ce4bdaa X-Archives-Hash: d0c4b042474aead29fd1670bd0daeae1 On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 06:20:55AM +0100, Per Wigren wrote: > On Thursday 27 March 2003 00:28, Abhishek Amit wrote: > > On 00:57 Wed 26 Mar , Per Wigren wrote: > > > Another one is x11-themes/redhat-artwork which should be called bluecurve > > > instead... Yes, that one is my fault because I submitted it as > > > redhat-artwork a long time ago.. ;) > > > A long time ago I heard that people could not call it Bluecurve as > > Redhat has a copyright on that. > > But the theme IS Bluecurve.. It's not a clone, it's not a derivate, it IS the > original Bluecurve. Of course we must be able to call it Bluecurve. Well check with your legal folk. http://www.redhat.com/about/corporate/trademark/guidelines/ page 6 is probably what you're after. -- Michael. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list