From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14825 invoked by uid 1002); 27 Mar 2003 05:30:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 2275 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2003 05:30:22 -0000 From: Per Wigren To: Abhishek Amit Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:20:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200303260057.43296.wigren@home.se> <20030326232820.GA9138@datalap.aamit.com> In-Reply-To: <20030326232820.GA9138@datalap.aamit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303270620.57138.wigren@home.se> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Renaming ebuilds... X-Archives-Salt: 23919132-f2a9-44d7-8b47-7606b0ff9243 X-Archives-Hash: 8c7feb0962be71905e82a08348536743 On Thursday 27 March 2003 00:28, Abhishek Amit wrote: > On 00:57 Wed 26 Mar , Per Wigren wrote: > > Another one is x11-themes/redhat-artwork which should be called bluecurve > > instead... Yes, that one is my fault because I submitted it as > > redhat-artwork a long time ago.. ;) > A long time ago I heard that people could not call it Bluecurve as > Redhat has a copyright on that. But the theme IS Bluecurve.. It's not a clone, it's not a derivate, it IS the original Bluecurve. Of course we must be able to call it Bluecurve. Maybe we can't change it into another theme and still call it Bluecurve, but that is not the case with Gentoo. ;) // Per -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list