public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sami Näätänen" <sami.naatanen@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage quibbles
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:39:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200303261339.37990.sami.naatanen@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1048524313.21464.10.camel@mtlsrv_iis_test>

On Monday 24 March 2003 18:45, Louis-Philippe Brochu wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 10:08, Abhishek Amit wrote:
> > > IMHO Portage should have a way to upgrade all installed packages.
> > > No need for dependencies checking (--deep) or world file, Just go
> > > through the list of all installed packages (that we can get with
> > > qpkg) and act as if there were part of the world file in the
> > > current implementation. In fact i think such an option should be
> > > the default one
> > >
> > > What do you think? Why would someone want to update only packages
> > > in the world file? What are the advantages/disadvantages of the
> > > previous method compared to the current --deep option?
> >
> > Try doing emerge `qpkg -I -nc`. This should do what you are looking
> > for.
>
> What i mean is, why isn't this option the default option when
> upgrading all packages? I'm sure i'm not the only one that thought,
> at first, that emerge world was supposed to do that.

If some package needs a specific version of other package you wouldn't 
want to update that other package. If you do emerge `qpkg -I -nc` you 
can make some packages in state where they no longer work, because 
their dependencies are not met anymore.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-26 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-20 16:11 [gentoo-dev] Portage quibbles Dhruba Bandopadhyay
2003-03-20 16:21 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-03-20 22:26   ` Bernhard Bock
2003-03-21  0:35   ` Brad Laue
2003-03-24 13:58     ` Louis-Philippe Brochu
2003-03-24 15:08       ` Abhishek Amit
2003-03-24 16:45         ` Louis-Philippe Brochu
2003-03-26 11:39           ` Sami Näätänen [this message]
2003-03-21  0:43   ` Greg
2003-03-21 11:00     ` Dan Armak
2003-03-21 15:47       ` Brad Laue
2003-03-21 19:16         ` Brandon Low
2003-03-22  3:15       ` Klaus-J. Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200303261339.37990.sami.naatanen@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --to=sami.naatanen@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox