From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32603 invoked by uid 1002); 12 Mar 2003 04:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8177 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2003 04:49:28 -0000 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:53:55 -0500 From: gentoo@myrealbox.com To: Peter Ruskin Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030312045355.GB10970@ishuatan.k8la.net> References: <20030311055442.A11490@twobit.net> <200303120041.06190.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303120041.06190.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent reallity Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r9 -- Out for testing X-Archives-Salt: ef0bf47d-b5b0-4fcc-83a0-af329c3836d5 X-Archives-Hash: 65faf0226c9957ff7e9037df7449e2b2 > I used FEATURES="sandbox ccache userpriv usersandbox keepwork" and the > only directories in /var/tmp/portage/xfree-4.3.0-r1/ were image temp and > work. Xfree emerged with absolutely no problems for me with the new portage. I have no FEATURES set in /etc/make.conf so that may be where your problem lies. -- Thomas M. Beaudry k8la / ys1ztm gentoo@myrealbox.com -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list