[gentoo-dev] db-3.2.9-r2

[gentoo-dev] db-3.2.9-r2

[Brandon Low]

This new revision won't build for me, has anyone else had troubles or is it just me?  Thanks!

--Brandon

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] db-3.2.9-r2

[Dave Nellans]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 280 bytes --]

Worked ok here on several x86 boxes...  what breaks?

dave

On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 14:03, Brandon Low wrote:
> This new revision won't build for me, has anyone else had troubles or is it just me?  Thanks!
> 
> --Brandon
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-- 

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] db-3.2.9-r2

[Brandon Low]

Log file for the failed db compile.
http://gentoo.lostlogicx.com/2834-db-3.2.9-r2.log

emerge info:

Portage 2.0.47-r3 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.2, glibc-2.3.1-r3)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.4.20-lolo-r1 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) processor
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirrors.twobit.net/gentoo http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu/"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/share/config /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/env.d"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
USE="x86 3dnow apache2 berkdb crypt cups fbcon gdbm gpm imap innodb jikes libwww mbox mmx mysql ncurses odbc pam perl python readline samba spell sse ssl svga tcpd threads zlib"
COMPILER="gcc3"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon-tbird -O3 -fgcse -fgcse-lm -fgcse-sm -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
CXXFLAGS="-march=athlon-tbird -O3 -fgcse -fgcse-lm -fgcse-sm -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -Wno-deprecated"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
MAKEOPTS="-j3"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
FEATURES="sandbox buildpkg ccache distcc userpriv usersandbox"
 

On Mon, 02/24/03 at 14:39:01 -0700, Dave Nellans wrote:
> Worked ok here on several x86 boxes...  what breaks?
> 
> dave
> 
> On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 14:03, Brandon Low wrote:
> > This new revision won't build for me, has anyone else had troubles or is it just me?  Thanks!
> > 
> > --Brandon
> > 
> > --
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> -- 



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] db-3.2.9-r2

[Matt Tucker]

-- Brandon Low <lostlogic@gentoo.org> spake thusly:

> Log file for the failed db compile.
> http://gentoo.lostlogicx.com/2834-db-3.2.9-r2.log

I'm not sure whether this will help, but it might give you a place to
start looking. The error seems to involve the db.h file that gets
included. For instance, the message:

    ../db_dump185/db_dump185.c:210: warning: assignment makes
    pointer from integer without a cast

Indicates that on line 210:

    if ((dbp = dbopen(argv[0], ...

dbopen is not defined, so the compiler is assuming it returns an
integer, when in fact the correct function definition returns a DB*.

There are two versions of db.h, one for 1.85 and one for 3.2.9. The
3.2.9 version (which _doesn't_ define dbopen) is in
/tmp/portage/.../build-static/, and the 1.85 version is in
/usr/include/db1/. Your compile command for db_dump185 is:

    gcc -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../dist/../include -D_REENTRANT 
     ../dist/../db_dump185/db_dump185.c

whereas on my system it's using:

    gcc -I/usr/include/db1  -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../dist/../include
    -D_REENTRANT  ../dist/../db_dump185/db_dump185.c

This stuff is hard-coded in dist/Makefile.in:

    DB185INC= -I/usr/include/db1	-c @CFLAGS@
              -I$(srcdir)/include     @CPPFLAGS@
    DB185LIB= -ldb1
    .
    .
    .
    db_dump185@o@: $(srcdir)/db_dump185/db_dump185.c
    	$(CC) $(DB185INC) $?

However, it's _NOT_ in Makefile.in.orig, so I assume there's a gentoo
patch that you're not picking up. 'emerge sync' perhaps?

Although I would say that if there are two different revisions of the
same ebuild version, there's a design issue. But that seems to be what
Gentoo does.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] db-3.2.9-r2

[Matt Tucker]

-- Matt Tucker <tuck@whistlingfish.net> spake thusly:

> Your compile command for db_dump185 is:
> 
>     gcc -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../dist/../include -D_REENTRANT 
>      ../dist/../db_dump185/db_dump185.c
> 
> whereas on my system it's using:
> 
>     gcc -I/usr/include/db1  -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../dist/../include
>     -D_REENTRANT  ../dist/../db_dump185/db_dump185.c
> 
> This stuff is hard-coded in dist/Makefile.in:
> 
>     DB185INC= -I/usr/include/db1	-c @CFLAGS@
>               -I$(srcdir)/include     @CPPFLAGS@
>     DB185LIB= -ldb1
>     .
>     .
>     .
>     db_dump185@o@: $(srcdir)/db_dump185/db_dump185.c
>     	$(CC) $(DB185INC) $?
> 
> However, it's _NOT_ in Makefile.in.orig, so I assume there's a gentoo
> patch that you're not picking up. 'emerge sync' perhaps?

A followup on this. In db-3.2.9-r2.ebuild, I see:

	# We should get dump185 to link against system db1 ..
	# <azarah@gentoo.org> (23 Feb 2003)
	cp ${S}/dist/Makefile.in ${S}/dist/Makefile.in.orig
	sed -e 's:DB185INC=:DB185INC= -I/usr/include/db1:' \
		-e 's:DB185LIB=:DB185LIB= -ldb1:' \
		${S}/dist/Makefile.in.orig > ${S}/dist/Makefile.in

I'm going to bet that this isn't in your version -- particularly
because the change was apparently made yesterday.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] db-3.2.9-r2

[Brandon Low]

Thanks you were quite right... the problem acutally turned out to be that the sed statement couldn't be applied under userpriv mode (which I use).  I'll be modifying the ebuild to work with userpriv sometime soon.

--Brandon

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] db-3.2.9-r2

[Henti Smith]

On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:03:37 -0600
Brandon Low <lostlogic@gentoo.org> wrote:

> This new revision won't build for me, has anyone else had troubles or is it just me?  Thanks!

built fine for me .. 

Henti 

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] db-3.2.9-r2

[Jay Pfeifer]

I've built it just fine on 4 different machines. What errors are you getting 
when it fails?

Thanks,

_j_

On Monday 24 February 2003 15:03, Brandon Low wrote:
> This new revision won't build for me, has anyone else had troubles or is it
> just me?  Thanks!
>
> --Brandon
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] db-3.2.9-r2

[Peter Ruskin]

On Monday 24 Feb 2003 21:03, Brandon Low wrote:
> This new revision won't build for me, has anyone else had troubles or
> is it just me?  Thanks!
>
> --Brandon

It failed for me too, until I emerged glibc-2.3.1-r3

Peter
-- 
Gentoo-1.4.2.8 Unstable. KDE: 3.1.0 Qt: 3.1.0
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+ 768MB.	Kernel: 2.4.20-xfs_pre6.	GCC 3.2.2


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list