From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10551 invoked by uid 1002); 19 Feb 2003 09:11:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 23136 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2003 09:11:53 -0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:01:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030216094614.B27729@twobit.net> <200302181042.33133.yannick.koehler@colubris.com> <20030218205228.GC4875%jca@po.cwru.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030218205228.GC4875%jca@po.cwru.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_zf0U+X5jhA1C2pw"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200302191001.40247.gentoo-user@devrieze.net> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 Out For Testing X-Archives-Salt: d5082959-87df-4ab3-aaa0-c6b36ca0df91 X-Archives-Hash: 77bfdc2f1f015c6c62a799a94b50e9d5 --Boundary-02=_zf0U+X5jhA1C2pw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 18 February 2003 21:52, Jeff Ames wrote: > Is this a new feature, or would emerging portage have deleted portage > from /etc/passwd? portage was in /etc/group after this emerge, so I > didn't have to change anything there. > Yes, this is a new feature, older portages could not run as a user Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Researcher Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl Homepage: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~pauldv --Boundary-02=_zf0U+X5jhA1C2pw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+U0fzNb2zbbdIrucRApL7AJ9/wS9QpcU4qFOZ53OgHhM6fjW4SwCfW8tl 3ACLFaBRt/IBamuWx6eUq/w= =G7da -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_zf0U+X5jhA1C2pw--