From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12650 invoked by uid 1002); 17 Feb 2003 18:19:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21394 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 18:19:49 -0000 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:10:26 +0100 From: Alexander Futasz To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030217191026.7051d273.acid.punk@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20030216094614.B27729@twobit.net> References: <20030216094614.B27729@twobit.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r1 testing X-Archives-Salt: bb5df56d-6ea2-465b-86c9-ae750bf1e981 X-Archives-Hash: d59cee650c54e7e3bd52964a889fe063 On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 09:46:14 -0600, Nick Jones wrote: > Ok. Portage-2.0.47-r1 is ready for testing. It's got a lot of new > stuff in it along with a good deal of fixes. Should be 'wicked-fast' > as it has a lot of updates to caching code and the like. It is masked > in package.mask. I need testers AND feedback. Gimme a holler with > bugs and good/bad comments. Here or on bugs.gentoo.org is fine. Sounds nice. Any plans on merging the following patch? http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4709 This adds autoupdating of configfiles that havn't been touched and thus makes a emerge baselayout much less painfull. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list