From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32041 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Feb 2003 12:52:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26828 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2003 12:52:47 -0000 From: Dylan Carlson Reply-To: absinthe@pobox.com To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 07:43:41 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302130743.41192.absinthe@pobox.com> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Qt-mozilla X-Archives-Salt: 6c14d338-3bfc-4f01-9af3-3a33c4eb9884 X-Archives-Hash: 581ca935f3cd25110f62e2320e3dd4a3 FYI. Chris Seawood @ Mozilla is putting the Qt build stuff on the chopping block. If you want to see the Qt build of mozilla get fixed and survive as an alternative to GTK and Xlib, you should add yourself and comments to this bug: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178987 IMO -- I think it's important to keep all of the toolkits working, and if given the choice and it worked correctly, I would probably choose Qt over GTK... since I generally prefer my Qt apps overall vs GTK equivalents. Cheers, Dylan Carlson [absinthe@pobox.com] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list