From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14281 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Feb 2003 21:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20518 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 21:56:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:41:58 +0200 From: Martin Schlemmer To: Steven Lucy Cc: tilt@bluecherry.net,gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030203234158.1083e12a.azarah@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030129222041.A22052@harper.uchicago.edu> References: <20030129183809.A4840@harper.uchicago.edu> <1043898001.9268.1.camel@blackhole> <20030129222041.A22052@harper.uchicago.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc X-Archives-Salt: b99d0e49-776f-4087-acb3-b946ac58bae8 X-Archives-Hash: 285f07111b48515ac7d0ec8179c5d580 On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:20:41 -0600 Steven Lucy wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:40:01PM -0500, Nicholas Hockey > said > > unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH and try re-emerging glibc > > of course that's what i did, i was just suggesting that the ebuild > could do this for you... > Why should it if the ./configure script handles it nicely ? =) -- Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list