From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17495 invoked by uid 1002); 1 Feb 2003 12:14:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 14681 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2003 12:14:21 -0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 13:07:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200301312328.50281.danarmak@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200301312328.50281.danarmak@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-UID: 1055 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_5h7O+xHMqTMNhvb" Message-Id: <200302011307.21935.gentoo-user@devrieze.net> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Does anyone use kxicq? X-Archives-Salt: eacf6aa5-66d9-4674-b2e0-057ae330d11d X-Archives-Hash: c8073af708918f1d79daa72e56aab73d --Boundary-00=_5h7O+xHMqTMNhvb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 31 January 2003 22:28, Dan Armak wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The kxicq project, though perhaps not officially dead, seems rather > catatonic (admittedly i haven't tried contacting the developers). The last > release was over a year ago for kde2, and their cvs hasn't seen any > activity for two months now; we have a patched snapshot of their CVS that > works for kde3, but now there's a bugreport against it (#13105). There are > several icq clients in portage (licq and sim have qt/kde interfaces) and I > wouldn't have any objection to dropping one that isn't really actively > developed anymore. Of course, that's likely the maintainer speaking :-) > > I'm not saying I've decided to remove the kxicq ebuild, but I'd like to > know how many people (if at all) use it. If people reply to this saying > "yes I use it and don't want to switch", the decision will of course be > taken out of my hands, I won't decide to remove it from portage then. So > please mail me if that is the case. I did use it, but it allready was buggy without qt-3.1 There is one bug that I reported at least 5 months ago including a fix that involved reading messages send by the yabber icq conduit. It is still not fixed in cvs. I believe this project is dead. In the mean time I switched, as kxicq is basically dead. It does have one usefull feature though in being able to use server based friend lists. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Researcher Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --Boundary-00=_5h7O+xHMqTMNhvb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=" " Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+O7SBNb2zbbdIrucRAj8+AJ90NT1FhvyDGMVE8o22natN9Owj7gCfYO3e Nv/PhKXqRHA4/3yFJaag7ug= =8e5P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-00=_5h7O+xHMqTMNhvb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list --Boundary-00=_5h7O+xHMqTMNhvb--