public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan Hermann <sh@kde-coder.de>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split KDE packages?
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:57:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301280457.47708.sh@kde-coder.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301271908.14467.absinthe@pobox.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi,



On Tuesday 28 January 2003 01:08, Dylan Carlson wrote:
> On Monday 27 January 2003 06:42 pm, Jan Winhuysen wrote:
> > Hello everyone!
> > Is there a future plan to split the kde source packages into ebuilds for
> > single applications? Debian had this once, when it was on my box. I
> > think this would be a good idea, but I don't have the know-how to do
> > it...
>
> It's all done via Makefiles in the source distribution mostly.   Getting
> this solved is a matter of convincing some people that this issue matters
> to enough users, and in turn finding the right way to put it in.
>
> Cervisia is (afaik) the only thing that exists independently of any KDE
> bundle at this moment.
>
> Please refer to the existing bug on this issue.  Please add your comments
> and CC: yourself to it.
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11123

I don't think this is a good idea.
On RedHat distribution you got this foolish system (of course binary 
packages).
You don't know which application is in the normal kde distribution or just a 
plain application like whatever.

If you see kde as one complete desktop enviroment, then you let kde as is 
(compiling all applications in one package the same time), there aren't a lot 
of patches for kde in the last few months, so we can live with it as is.

regards,

\sh
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+Nf+7V8AnusWiV6wRAr3RAKDOscWdRsT7AekHSNFpNqNseuUMUwCgxqNF
RdUp+eaNzh+5z8uXWwrhoXs=
=VFeK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-28  4:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-27 23:42 [gentoo-dev] Split KDE packages? Jan Winhuysen
2003-01-28  0:08 ` Dylan Carlson
2003-01-28  3:57   ` Stephan Hermann [this message]
2003-01-28  4:13     ` Riyad Kalla
2003-01-28 10:34     ` Dylan Carlson
2003-01-28 10:56       ` Jan Winhuysen
2003-01-28 13:40       ` Riyad Kalla
2003-01-28 14:08         ` Marko Mikulicic
2003-01-28 14:32           ` Dylan Carlson
2003-01-28 14:44             ` Dylan Carlson
2003-01-28 14:24         ` Jan Winhuysen
2003-01-28 15:27       ` Stephan Hermann
2003-01-28 16:43         ` Dylan Carlson
2003-01-29 14:15       ` Dan Armak
2003-01-29 14:30         ` Dylan Carlson
2003-01-29 14:38           ` Riyad Kalla
2003-01-29 15:09           ` Dan Armak
2003-01-29 15:34             ` Dylan Carlson
2003-01-29 21:24         ` John Nilsson
2003-01-30  9:13           ` Stephan Hermann
2003-01-30 10:25             ` John Nilsson
2003-01-30 13:11               ` Dan Armak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200301280457.47708.sh@kde-coder.de \
    --to=sh@kde-coder.de \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox