From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23239 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jan 2003 02:19:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 22477 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2003 02:19:14 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger Reply-To: vapier@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:13:03 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <77490000.1043711617@valkyrie.lsit.ucsb.edu> In-Reply-To: <77490000.1043711617@valkyrie.lsit.ucsb.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200301272113.03621.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cups x86 USE flag. X-Archives-Salt: b61626b7-7c9c-4c05-92c1-5ffbc8fc8de7 X-Archives-Hash: b312f51793a4e7a1deac407221ff21cd On Monday 27 January 2003 18:53, Max Kalika wrote: > Greetings Gentoo devs. > > I have a question as to why the new cups ebuild tests for x86 to determine > whether or not to depend on hotplug (and consequently usbutils and > pciutiles). This flag is also not defined in IUSE. you dont define KEYWORDS in IUSE ... its a test for arch, not for USE > Wouldn't this functionality be better achieved with a "usb" or "hotplug" > USE flag? I realize that no such flag exists yet, but I can see it being > useful elsewhere so why not create it? we have a bug open about a usb USE flag > ---max kalika > --max@lsit.ucsb.edu > -lsit systems administrator > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list