From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4796 invoked by uid 1002); 23 Jan 2003 20:12:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 30371 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2003 20:12:07 -0000 From: Mike Lundy To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:06:37 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200301232105.50700.gentoo@dewet.org> <20030123192045.GA29326@localhost> <200301232133.28383.gentoo@dewet.org> In-Reply-To: <200301232133.28383.gentoo@dewet.org> X-Pants: On MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_RtEM+qkQkTSi2wh"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200301231506.41161.novas007@gmx.net> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources vs "stock" kernels X-Archives-Salt: e432b9a6-b803-4c5a-b506-001b11749241 X-Archives-Hash: 641f8df6e0acd097867acf07c887b0db --Boundary-02=_RtEM+qkQkTSi2wh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 23 January 2003 14:33, Dewet Diener wrote: > That's my question (albeit stated very badly) -- how > reliable/tested/stable are those patches? The case in point being the > grsecurity issues I've seen. Grsecurity gets such a bad rap, but truly, it's not a grsecurity problem. I= t's=20 grsecurity acting as it says it does. People enabling it without reading th= e=20 help: CONFIG_GRKERNSEC If you say Y here, you will be able to configure many features that will enhance the security of your system. It is highly recommended that you say Y here and read through the help for each option so you fully understand the features and can evaluate their usefulness for your machine. are the ones at fault. I've been using grsecurity for months with no proble= ms=20 that aren't my fault. :) PS Sorry that you'll get this twice, Dewet. This one's to the list as well.= My=20 fault. =2D-=20 To smash a single atom, all mankind was intent. Now any day the atom may return the compliment. --Boundary-02=_RtEM+qkQkTSi2wh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+MEtR/tNA0+e85ksRAtBnAJ9dDctRriGXPSPZHAaZhfTNMCzUvQCfcq7C QnAAFk3YGuO2jaq5eDRqHLM= =vTag -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_RtEM+qkQkTSi2wh--