* [gentoo-dev] perl again @ 2003-01-07 19:14 Tony Clark 2003-01-07 19:21 ` Michael Cummings 2003-01-08 13:14 ` Michael Cummings 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Tony Clark @ 2003-01-07 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Just wondering what version of perl will go in 1.4 release. I have built it a couple of times now testing stage1 builds and ended up with 5.8 the first time and 5.6.1 now. tony -- Contract ASIC and FPGA design. Telephone +46 702 894 667 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] perl again 2003-01-07 19:14 [gentoo-dev] perl again Tony Clark @ 2003-01-07 19:21 ` Michael Cummings 2003-01-07 19:23 ` Riyad Kalla ` (2 more replies) 2003-01-08 13:14 ` Michael Cummings 1 sibling, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Michael Cummings @ 2003-01-07 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw To: Tony Clark; +Cc: gentoo-dev I'm trying to get feed back on the ~arch masked of 5.8. I want it in 1.4, and the deadline for that is tomorrow, so please email me if it worked for you (ok,ok, email me if it didn't work too) On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:14:38PM +0100, Tony Clark wrote: > Just wondering what version of perl will go in 1.4 release. I have built it a > couple of times now testing stage1 builds and ended up with 5.8 the first > time and 5.6.1 now. > > tony > -- > Contract ASIC and FPGA design. > Telephone > +46 702 894 667 > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: [gentoo-dev] perl again 2003-01-07 19:21 ` Michael Cummings @ 2003-01-07 19:23 ` Riyad Kalla 2003-01-08 2:45 ` Joseph Carter 2003-01-08 3:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Jackson 2003-01-07 19:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tony Clark 2003-01-07 20:07 ` George Shapovalov 2 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Riyad Kalla @ 2003-01-07 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw To: mcummings, 'Tony Clark'; +Cc: gentoo-dev Tommorow? So no waiting for KDE? If you guys do release on the 14th, that's one day after 3.1 comes out, talk about cutting it close! :) -Riyad > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Cummings [mailto:mcummings@datanode.net] > Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:22 PM > To: Tony Clark > Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl again > > > I'm trying to get feed back on the ~arch masked of 5.8. I > want it in 1.4, and the deadline for that is tomorrow, so > please email me if it worked for you (ok,ok, email me if it > didn't work too) > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:14:38PM +0100, Tony Clark wrote: > > Just wondering what version of perl will go in 1.4 release. I have > > built it a > > couple of times now testing stage1 builds and ended up with > 5.8 the first > > time and 5.6.1 now. > > > > tony > > -- > > Contract ASIC and FPGA design. > > Telephone > > +46 702 894 667 > > > > -- > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] perl again 2003-01-07 19:23 ` Riyad Kalla @ 2003-01-08 2:45 ` Joseph Carter 2003-01-08 5:27 ` Riyad Kalla 2003-01-08 3:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Jackson 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Joseph Carter @ 2003-01-08 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw To: Riyad Kalla; +Cc: mcummings, 'Tony Clark', gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1622 bytes --] On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:23:42PM -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote: > Tommorow? So no waiting for KDE? If you guys do release on the 14th, > that's one day after 3.1 comes out, talk about cutting it close! :) If I bring one pearl of wisdom from years of involvement with Debian, it is that you should NEVER hold up the release of something like a Linux distribution for someone else's product which is due "any day now", even if that date has been set in stone. The reasons for this are many and include: - Release dates slip, you could be waiting longer than anticipated. The development team is confident that Gentoo will be ready for release on the 14th. It should release then if it is! If other things will come along later, then so be it. It's easyer to add something as an upgrade to what's already released than to hold up the entire release while it is integrated. - It's not like you can "just wait a few days more" for it; there's QA issues to contend with. Is the software ready for everyone? The people who released it may think so, but as always Gentoo would need to do its own testing to make sure it does not bork your system for you. - If the release is delayed for every "just one more thing" that comes along, then a release will never happen. (Of course, observance of this does not seem to help Debian release any faster than if they had added every little thing along the way, but I digress quickly.. *g*) -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@efn.org> glDisable (DX8_CRAP); We've upped our standards, so up yours! [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: [gentoo-dev] perl again 2003-01-08 2:45 ` Joseph Carter @ 2003-01-08 5:27 ` Riyad Kalla 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Riyad Kalla @ 2003-01-08 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw To: 'Joseph Carter'; +Cc: mcummings, 'Tony Clark', gentoo-dev Yes you have a good point. I'll just bootstap my system, then wait a few days before emerge kde'ing (so I don't have to compile it 2wice, which takes slightly longer than eternity) Best, -Riyad -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Carter [mailto:knghtbrd@efn.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 7:45 PM To: Riyad Kalla Cc: mcummings@datanode.net; 'Tony Clark'; gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl again On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:23:42PM -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote: > Tommorow? So no waiting for KDE? If you guys do release on the 14th, > that's one day after 3.1 comes out, talk about cutting it close! :) If I bring one pearl of wisdom from years of involvement with Debian, it is that you should NEVER hold up the release of something like a Linux distribution for someone else's product which is due "any day now", even if that date has been set in stone. The reasons for this are many and include: - Release dates slip, you could be waiting longer than anticipated. The development team is confident that Gentoo will be ready for release on the 14th. It should release then if it is! If other things will come along later, then so be it. It's easyer to add something as an upgrade to what's already released than to hold up the entire release while it is integrated. - It's not like you can "just wait a few days more" for it; there's QA issues to contend with. Is the software ready for everyone? The people who released it may think so, but as always Gentoo would need to do its own testing to make sure it does not bork your system for you. - If the release is delayed for every "just one more thing" that comes along, then a release will never happen. (Of course, observance of this does not seem to help Debian release any faster than if they had added every little thing along the way, but I digress quickly.. *g*) -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@efn.org> glDisable (DX8_CRAP); We've upped our standards, so up yours! -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: perl again 2003-01-07 19:23 ` Riyad Kalla 2003-01-08 2:45 ` Joseph Carter @ 2003-01-08 3:11 ` Brian Jackson 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Brian Jackson @ 2003-01-08 3:11 UTC (permalink / raw To: Riyad Kalla; +Cc: mcummings, 'Tony Clark', gentoo-dev The kde team usually releases the tarballs to packagers a little while in advance, so there may yet be hope. --Brian Riyad Kalla writes: > Tommorow? So no waiting for KDE? If you guys do release on the 14th, > that's one day after 3.1 comes out, talk about cutting it close! :) > > -Riyad > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Cummings [mailto:mcummings@datanode.net] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:22 PM >> To: Tony Clark >> Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl again >> >> >> I'm trying to get feed back on the ~arch masked of 5.8. I >> want it in 1.4, and the deadline for that is tomorrow, so >> please email me if it worked for you (ok,ok, email me if it >> didn't work too) >> >> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:14:38PM +0100, Tony Clark wrote: >> > Just wondering what version of perl will go in 1.4 release. I have >> > built it a >> > couple of times now testing stage1 builds and ended up with >> 5.8 the first >> > time and 5.6.1 now. >> > >> > tony >> > -- >> > Contract ASIC and FPGA design. >> > Telephone >> > +46 702 894 667 >> > >> > -- >> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list >> >> -- >> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list >> > > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] perl again 2003-01-07 19:21 ` Michael Cummings 2003-01-07 19:23 ` Riyad Kalla @ 2003-01-07 19:48 ` Tony Clark 2003-01-07 20:07 ` George Shapovalov 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Tony Clark @ 2003-01-07 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw To: mcummings; +Cc: gentoo-dev I didn't test it all that much but the stuff I did test seemed to work ok. I did have a little problem with dvdrip which could have been perl related. I didn't check into it too deeply at the time as I didn't require cluster mode on that machine. Basicly you can't start cluster mode in dvdrip. could be a perl problem but also could be something else. I can test it again tomorrow, my system won't be ready tonight. tony On Tuesday 07 January 2003 20.21, Michael Cummings wrote: > I'm trying to get feed back on the ~arch masked of 5.8. I want it in > 1.4, and the deadline for that is tomorrow, so please email me > if it worked for you (ok,ok, email me if it didn't work too) > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:14:38PM +0100, Tony Clark wrote: > > Just wondering what version of perl will go in 1.4 release. I have built > > it a couple of times now testing stage1 builds and ended up with 5.8 the > > first time and 5.6.1 now. > > > > tony > > -- > > Contract ASIC and FPGA design. > > Telephone > > +46 702 894 667 > > > > -- > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- Contract ASIC and FPGA design. Telephone +46 702 894 667 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] perl again 2003-01-07 19:21 ` Michael Cummings 2003-01-07 19:23 ` Riyad Kalla 2003-01-07 19:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tony Clark @ 2003-01-07 20:07 ` George Shapovalov 2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: George Shapovalov @ 2003-01-07 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Being building the system starting from the liveCD-basic (stage1) using x86 and ~x86 (thus picking up perl-5.8 and quite a bit more stuff). So far things seem to be fine. X, fluxbox and few other apps are working, still compiling kde... Also upgraded to perl-5.8 on my laptop and being using it quite a bit since (for about two weeks now). Seems to be working fine.. George On Tuesday 07 January 2003 11:21, Michael Cummings wrote: > I'm trying to get feed back on the ~arch masked of 5.8. I want it in > 1.4, and the deadline for that is tomorrow, so please email me > if it worked for you (ok,ok, email me if it didn't work too) > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:14:38PM +0100, Tony Clark wrote: > > Just wondering what version of perl will go in 1.4 release. I have built > > it a couple of times now testing stage1 builds and ended up with 5.8 the > > first time and 5.6.1 now. > > > > tony > > -- > > Contract ASIC and FPGA design. > > Telephone > > +46 702 894 667 > > > > -- > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] perl again 2003-01-07 19:14 [gentoo-dev] perl again Tony Clark 2003-01-07 19:21 ` Michael Cummings @ 2003-01-08 13:14 ` Michael Cummings 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Michael Cummings @ 2003-01-08 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Just wanted to say thanks to everyone who responded on this thread, input appreciated! Mike On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:14:38PM +0100, Tony Clark wrote: > Just wondering what version of perl will go in 1.4 release. I have built it a > couple of times now testing stage1 builds and ended up with 5.8 the first > time and 5.6.1 now. > > tony > -- > Contract ASIC and FPGA design. > Telephone > +46 702 894 667 > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-08 13:18 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-01-07 19:14 [gentoo-dev] perl again Tony Clark 2003-01-07 19:21 ` Michael Cummings 2003-01-07 19:23 ` Riyad Kalla 2003-01-08 2:45 ` Joseph Carter 2003-01-08 5:27 ` Riyad Kalla 2003-01-08 3:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Brian Jackson 2003-01-07 19:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tony Clark 2003-01-07 20:07 ` George Shapovalov 2003-01-08 13:14 ` Michael Cummings
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox