From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19755 invoked by uid 1002); 7 Jan 2003 17:33:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 16383 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2003 17:32:40 -0000 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 09:29:20 -0800 From: Alan To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030107172920.GD13243@ufies.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: [gentoo-dev] xft blocks qt-2.3.2-r1 ? X-Archives-Salt: ec814dca-7fa5-42ec-9961-ee65c3f6cc41 X-Archives-Hash: 69aa3efae878178bb1d6d927c5dd995e Greetings guys. I'm just finishing up a setup of a 1.4_rc2 box and I tried to install a cd burning program for qt called koncd. It requires qt 2.3.2, but emerge reports that it is blocked by the x11-libs/xft package. These two don't seem related, and it seems a bit odd for the block. alan@phoenix alan $ emerge -p /usr/portage/x11-libs/qt/qt-2.3.2-r1.ebuild These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [blocks B ] x11-libs/xft (from pkg x11-libs/qt-2.3.2-r1) [ebuild UD] x11-libs/qt-2.3.2-r1 [3.1.0-r1] Is this a bug, or will qt 2 provide xft (seems doubtful to me somehow). Can anyone explain? alan -- Alan - http://arcterex.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- "The only thing that experience teaches us is that experience teaches us nothing. -- Andre Maurois (Emile Herzog) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list