[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Stable site update

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Stable site update

[Maik Schreiber]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 820 bytes --]

Hi, a few updates to the Gentoo Stable site (http://gentoo-stable.iq-computing.de) have been made:

1. The query page is now a little easier to use. For example, you get selection boxes where possible (category, arch etc.).

2. A new filter has been added: You can now filter on "Portage status on {x86, ppc, sparc, alpha} {is, is not} {stable, unstable/testing, does
not work,unmarked}".

3. Various speed improvements regarding query have been made. Most importantly, if you only add new filters (which you normally do when
searching), the list of current results will be cached and re-used with your new filter in place. (Since filters are AND-combined, there's no
need to search through the _whole_ database.)

-- 
Maik Schreiber, Gentoo Linux Developer
http://www.gentoo.org
mailto:blizzy@gentoo.org

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Gentoo Stable site update

[Joachim Blaabjerg]

On Thursday 02 January 2003 11:28, Maik Schreiber wrote:
> Hi, a few updates to the Gentoo Stable site
> [...]

Hm, just a quick question.

Are there any tools available that scans the system for packages that are 
merged and marked unstable (~), and submits those as "merged successfully on 
my system"? I know I have a lot of unstable packages on my system, but I 
haven't got the time to through all of them and submit them to the 
Gentoo-stable site.

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Gentoo Stable site update

[Peter Ruskin]

On Thursday 02 Jan 2003 18:29, Joachim Blaabjerg wrote:
> On Thursday 02 January 2003 11:28, Maik Schreiber wrote:
> > Hi, a few updates to the Gentoo Stable site
> > [...]
>
> Hm, just a quick question.
>
> Are there any tools available that scans the system for packages that
> are merged and marked unstable (~), and submits those as "merged
> successfully on my system"? I know I have a lot of unstable packages on
> my system, but I haven't got the time to through all of them and submit
> them to the Gentoo-stable site.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
#!/bin/sh
#
# /usr/local/bin/list-tested
#
# Lists ebuilds installed with 'ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"'
#
# Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com>

LOGFILE=/home/peter/Gentoo/logs/list-tested-$(date +%Y-%m-%d-%H%M).log
# Sort the world file
WORLD=/var/cache/edb/world
SORTEDWORLD=$(mktemp $0.XXXXXX)
sort -u $WORLD > $SORTEDWORLD

# Make ~x86 list from cache in same format as world file
TESTING=$(mktemp $0.XXXXXX)
grep -r '~x86' /var/cache/edb/dep/* | cut -d/ -f6-7 | cut -d: -f1 | cut 
-d. -f1 | cut -d- -f1-3 | sed s/-[0-9].*//g > $TESTING
SORTEDTESTING=$(mktemp $0.XXXXXX)
sort -u $TESTING > $SORTEDTESTING

# Report matches and add versions
RESULT1=$(mktemp $0.XXXXXX)
RESULT2=$(mktemp $0.XXXXXX)
comm -12 $SORTEDWORLD $SORTEDTESTING > $RESULT1
cat $RESULT1 | cut -d/ -f2 > $RESULT2

touch $LOGFILE
echo "These ebuilds were installed using 'ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=\"~x86\"':"
echo "These ebuilds were installed using 'ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=\"~x86\"':" > 
$LOGFILE
cat $RESULT2 | xargs epm -qG | tee -a $LOGFILE

# Clean up
rm $SORTEDWORLD $TESTING $SORTEDTESTING $RESULT1 $RESULT2
----------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Gentoo Linux release 1.4rc1 Unstable. KDE: 3.1.0 (RC5) Qt: 3.1.0
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+ 512MB.	Kernel: 2.4.20-win4lin-r1-pnr.	GCC 3.2.1
Linux user #275590 (http://counter.li.org/). up 23:50.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Gentoo Stable site update

[Michael Cummings]

perhaps a silly question - but why not just grep "~x86" in
/var/db/pkg/*/*/*.ebuild (ok, do a find .ebuild | xargs grep, 
you know what I mean).

On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 06:51:52PM +0000, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Thursday 02 Jan 2003 18:29, Joachim Blaabjerg wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 January 2003 11:28, Maik Schreiber wrote:
> > > Hi, a few updates to the Gentoo Stable site
> > > [...]
> >
> > Hm, just a quick question.
> >
> > Are there any tools available that scans the system for packages that
> > are merged and marked unstable (~), and submits those as "merged
> > successfully on my system"? I know I have a lot of unstable packages on
> > my system, but I haven't got the time to through all of them and submit
> > them to the Gentoo-stable site.
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> # /usr/local/bin/list-tested
> #
> # Lists ebuilds installed with 'ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"'
> #
> # Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com>
> 
> LOGFILE=/home/peter/Gentoo/logs/list-tested-$(date +%Y-%m-%d-%H%M).log
> # Sort the world file
> WORLD=/var/cache/edb/world
> SORTEDWORLD=$(mktemp $0.XXXXXX)
> sort -u $WORLD > $SORTEDWORLD
> 
> # Make ~x86 list from cache in same format as world file
> TESTING=$(mktemp $0.XXXXXX)
> grep -r '~x86' /var/cache/edb/dep/* | cut -d/ -f6-7 | cut -d: -f1 | cut 
> -d. -f1 | cut -d- -f1-3 | sed s/-[0-9].*//g > $TESTING
> SORTEDTESTING=$(mktemp $0.XXXXXX)
> sort -u $TESTING > $SORTEDTESTING
> 
> # Report matches and add versions
> RESULT1=$(mktemp $0.XXXXXX)
> RESULT2=$(mktemp $0.XXXXXX)
> comm -12 $SORTEDWORLD $SORTEDTESTING > $RESULT1
> cat $RESULT1 | cut -d/ -f2 > $RESULT2
> 
> touch $LOGFILE
> echo "These ebuilds were installed using 'ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=\"~x86\"':"
> echo "These ebuilds were installed using 'ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=\"~x86\"':" > 
> $LOGFILE
> cat $RESULT2 | xargs epm -qG | tee -a $LOGFILE
> 
> # Clean up
> rm $SORTEDWORLD $TESTING $SORTEDTESTING $RESULT1 $RESULT2
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> -- 
> Gentoo Linux release 1.4rc1 Unstable. KDE: 3.1.0 (RC5) Qt: 3.1.0
> AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+ 512MB.	Kernel: 2.4.20-win4lin-r1-pnr.	GCC 3.2.1
> Linux user #275590 (http://counter.li.org/). up 23:50.
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Gentoo Stable site update

[Jason Calabrese]

> Are there any tools available that scans the system for packages that are 
> merged and marked unstable (~), and submits those as "merged successfully on 
> my system"? 

It would be cool if gentoo-stats would look for unstable packages and
collect stats on them.  

This wouldn't be as useful as the Gentoo Stable site sincthere is more
too it than just merging unstable packages successfully, but it would
provide a good count of how many people were using what unstable
packages.



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Gentoo Stable site update

[Toby Dickenson]

On Thursday 02 January 2003 6:59 pm, Michael Cummings wrote:
> perhaps a silly question - but why not just grep "~x86" in
> /var/db/pkg/*/*/*.ebuild (ok, do a find .ebuild | xargs grep,
> you know what I mean).

That finds ebuilds that were unstable when they were merged. They may not 
still be unstable.



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Gentoo Stable site update

[Maik Schreiber]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 655 bytes --]

> Are there any tools available that scans the system for packages that are 
> merged and marked unstable (~), and submits those as "merged successfully on 
> my system"?

No, not yet, and it wouldn't make much sense right now. The system is not capable to store something like "it is unknown whether this program
runs on the users box or not" (yet). It's either "yes" or "no", but not "unknown".

-- 
Maik Schreiber, Gentoo Linux Developer   *   http://www.gentoo.org
mailto:blizzy@gentoo.org

GPG public key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1F11D713        
Key fingerprint: CF19 AFCE 6E3D 5443 9599 18B5 5640 1F11 D713

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Gentoo Stable site update

[Maik Schreiber]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 428 bytes --]

> blizzy, we do not use sparc64 as a keyword anymore, any chance you could remove that?

Yes, sparc64 will be merged into sparc. I just didn't find the time to do that yet.

-- 
Maik Schreiber, Gentoo Linux Developer   *   http://www.gentoo.org
mailto:blizzy@gentoo.org

GPG public key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1F11D713        
Key fingerprint: CF19 AFCE 6E3D 5443 9599 18B5 5640 1F11 D713

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]