From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10457 invoked by uid 1002); 2 Jan 2003 14:22:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 5645 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 14:22:57 -0000 From: Johannes Findeisen To: Martin Volf , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 15:21:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030101175734.0d5fe96a.mv@inv.cz> In-Reply-To: <20030101175734.0d5fe96a.mv@inv.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: http://hanez.org Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200301021521.18151.mailman@hanez.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc without ada,f77,objc ? X-Archives-Salt: 6822b0a5-8d4f-424e-9492-ffafb62d4478 X-Archives-Hash: 5d8da94dbf2ec7aab362a4ee6026cb71 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hello martin, i don't think there is a way to do it without editing the ebuild file... there are no USE flags for ada,f77 and objc. you can see it in the ebuild of gcc, because there is a part where the java USE flag is used. it should be the same for for the other languages too. i would edit the ebuild and maybe say it to the developers in bugtraq, that we need USE flags for ada, f77 and objc. i don't think that they are inventing some new USE flags for this problem because it are big changes in the gcc ebuild... maybe ask the maintainer or author of the actual ebuild script... i know, that this is no help but i hope this information is usefull for you... i think the idea is not bad to add some more USE flags because not all people needs the other languages. kind regards hanez On Wednesday 01 January 2003 17:57, Martin Volf wrote: > Hello, > > is there an other way to emerge gcc without ada,f77,objc except editing the > .ebuild file? I don't need these languages, maybe the build would be a > little bit faster without them. Or am I wrong? I was quite disappointed > when I saw them built. Couldn't this be documented somewhere? > > Thanks. - -- begin .signature question: is it a feature to execute code in emails? i don't think so! end -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+FEre1e37d/WNRDURAuHhAJ4yvFZh7Ml74FVcCxBcHKQDGS9aDQCeMSHK m/GzxOevSUdjn1X27cDkPrw= =Csx9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list