From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14368 invoked by uid 1002); 31 Dec 2002 05:25:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 28693 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2002 05:25:21 -0000 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 23:23:42 -0600 From: Greg Oliver To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20021230232342.6d933c56.greg@algx.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; ) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] SAMBA and CUPS conflict with LPRng X-Archives-Salt: 9d0a1668-64f0-457f-8b33-3ff6daa84d88 X-Archives-Hash: 41668cc88372f6e402270620176a4b53 Your USE flags need to have "cups" removed and samba re-emerged probably. This will compile samba without the cups libraries linked in. -Greg On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:18:50 -0500 (EST) Denis Shcherbakov wrote: > > Hello, folks, > > I just wanted to ask what the deal is with the conflict between samba > and cups with lprng. I migrated from cups to lprng because it seems > to work much better for my systems for things like postscript printing > and gnuplot features. But I need samba too. However, with lprng on > the system, samba doesn't work because apparently it needs some cups > libraries! > > Samba doesn't REALLY need cups libs, does it? Only for certain > functionality, right? Is it possible to build samba without support > for printing? Like, edit the ebuild somehow? I don't need printing > over samba, but I do need to have it on my system and I do need lprng. > > I'd appreciate any help as to how to resolve this. > > Happy New Year! :) > > Denis > > > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list