From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9806 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Dec 2002 05:06:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8202 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2002 05:06:02 -0000 Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 00:04:11 -0500 From: Michael Cummings To: Greg Oliver Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20021228050411.GD32519@gnosis.datanode.net> Reply-To: mcummings@datanode.net Mail-Followup-To: Greg Oliver , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <20021227150259.24a4a84a.bain@tcsn.co.za> <200212271615.28206.ben@thatproject.co.uk> <20021227123128.2bae542b.mcummings@datanode.net> <20021227195727.5da1f4fe.bain@tcsn.co.za> <20021227153542.6542bd9c.mcummings@datanode.net> <20021227225656.2249c015.greg@algx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021227225656.2249c015.greg@algx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system .. X-Archives-Salt: 129a6408-9796-42c3-9bc9-5d07edf99042 X-Archives-Hash: 54fac61df4dd27022aa1dc905c1f93a5 It's actually been put back on hold until we can resolve a problem with the libperl.so (namely that it is always called libperl.so no matter what version it refers to). If that is fixed appropriately - hopefully no remerging will be necessary. If you go with the masked build, emerging will be necessary, which is something we'd rather avoid. -Mike On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 10:56:56PM -0600, Greg Oliver wrote: > Will it automatically rebuild all packages that are built against Perl > 5.6.1 libs when it emerges, or will I have to track them down with a > script and rebuild them manually? > > -Greg > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:35:42 -0500 > Michael Cummings wrote: > > > Henti, > > > > It's unmasked as of a few hours ago. Give it time to actually > > hit the mirrors. > > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:57:27 +0200 > > Henti Smith wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:31:28 -0500 > > > Michael Cummings wrote: > > > > > > > Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked > > > > on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are > > > > running this on a MIPS. > > > > > > > > Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86. > > > > > > > > Mike - the perl maintainer > > > > > > hmmmm ... > > > > > > > > > I had to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to et it working ... which is > > > not something I wanted to do .. > > > > > > Henti > > > > > > -- > > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -----o()o--------------------------------------------- > > | #gentoo-dev on irc.openprojects.net > > Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net > > Perl Guy | > > | GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E > > -----o()o--------------------------------------------- > > > > > > -- > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list