From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28536 invoked by uid 1002); 27 Dec 2002 20:34:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19406 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2002 20:34:14 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:35:42 -0500 From: Michael Cummings To: Henti Smith Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20021227153542.6542bd9c.mcummings@datanode.net> In-Reply-To: <20021227195727.5da1f4fe.bain@tcsn.co.za> References: <20021227150259.24a4a84a.bain@tcsn.co.za> <200212271615.28206.ben@thatproject.co.uk> <20021227123128.2bae542b.mcummings@datanode.net> <20021227195727.5da1f4fe.bain@tcsn.co.za> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; ) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system .. X-Archives-Salt: a70c2e16-da9d-46fa-bd20-84e16a686216 X-Archives-Hash: c8ccd59b598def842011dbbb92ff3d41 Henti, It's unmasked as of a few hours ago. Give it time to actually hit the mirrors. On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:57:27 +0200 Henti Smith wrote: > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:31:28 -0500 > Michael Cummings wrote: > > > Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are running this on a MIPS. > > > > Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86. > > > > Mike - the perl maintainer > > hmmmm ... > > > I had to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to et it working ... which is not something I wanted to do .. > > Henti > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > -- -----o()o--------------------------------------------- | #gentoo-dev on irc.openprojects.net Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net Perl Guy | | GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E -----o()o--------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list