[gentoo-dev] final release ?

[gentoo-dev] final release ?

[M. Zuelsdorff]

I am following the the discussion in the gentoo-dev group for more than a year 
now. All I see is "a problem with this" and "a problem with that". Some days 
ago, something even appeared to be "really fucked up". My question: When do 
you expect Gentoo to become a final usable release?

Best regards.

michael

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] final release ?

[Sven Vermeulen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1103 bytes --]

On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 05:35:19PM +0100, M. Zuelsdorff wrote:
> I am following the the discussion in the gentoo-dev group for more than a
> year now. All I see is "a problem with this" and "a problem with that".
> Some days ago, something even appeared to be "really fucked up". My
> question: When do you expect Gentoo to become a final usable release?

It is very normal that you frequently see problems arise on the mailinglist
but rarely successtories. This is because of human nature: we will swiftly
ask/seek for help (and the Gentoo Mailinglists are a good place to ask for
help) but rarely just mail to tell it works...

Think of it: if you emerge 10 tools, and 9 of them work flawlessly, you won't
mail the mailinglist about those 9 tools do you? No, you're going to mail
about the 10th tool that doesn't work.

So your perception doesn't mean that Gentoo isn't usuable.

Wkr,
	Sven Vermeulen

PS Don't start posting messages like
	"net-www/apache works"
	"net-ftp/ncftp works"
	"app-office/openoffice works"
	"app-sci/octave works"
	"x11-wm/fluxbox works"
	...
	"x11-base/xfree works"
   :-)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] final release ?

[Michael]

On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:58:56 +0100
Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@rug.ac.be> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 05:35:19PM +0100, M. Zuelsdorff wrote:
> > I am following the the discussion in the gentoo-dev group for more than a
> > year now. All I see is "a problem with this" and "a problem with that".
> > Some days ago, something even appeared to be "really fucked up". My
> > question: When do you expect Gentoo to become a final usable release?
> 
> It is very normal that you frequently see problems arise on the mailinglist
> but rarely successtories. This is because of human nature: we will swiftly
> ask/seek for help (and the Gentoo Mailinglists are a good place to ask for
> help) but rarely just mail to tell it works...

You are so right!
You ever listen to people talk on the bus?
allways complaining about something :P

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] final release ?

[Denis Shcherbakov]

Actually, I love Gentoo.  I discovered it in August 2002, and I've been
a happier man ever since. :)

Sure there are a few things here or there, but it's not like there are
no problems with Redhat or other distro's!!  It may sound funny, but I
find administration of a Linux box MUCH easier with Gentoo than with other
distro's I tried so far.  Gentoo really rocks.

Let's give it up for the Gentoo development team :)


On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Michael wrote:

On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:58:56 +0100
Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@rug.ac.be> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 05:35:19PM +0100, M. Zuelsdorff wrote:
> > I am following the the discussion in the gentoo-dev group for more than a
> > year now. All I see is "a problem with this" and "a problem with that".
> > Some days ago, something even appeared to be "really fucked up". My
> > question: When do you expect Gentoo to become a final usable release?
>
> It is very normal that you frequently see problems arise on the mailinglist
> but rarely successtories. This is because of human nature: we will swiftly
> ask/seek for help (and the Gentoo Mailinglists are a good place to ask for
> help) but rarely just mail to tell it works...

You are so right!
You ever listen to people talk on the bus?
allways complaining about something :P

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] final release ?

[daveman]

On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 12:06:46AM -0500, Denis Shcherbakov wrote:
> 
> Actually, I love Gentoo.  I discovered it in August 2002, and I've been
> a happier man ever since. :)
> 
> Sure there are a few things here or there, but it's not like there are
> no problems with Redhat or other distro's!!  It may sound funny, but I
> find administration of a Linux box MUCH easier with Gentoo than with other
> distro's I tried so far.  Gentoo really rocks.
> 
> Let's give it up for the Gentoo development team :)
> 
You make very good points. People can say what they want about Gentoo. I've yet to run into any "show stopper" problems that I simply didn't know how to fix that caused me to have to reinstall. That type of stuff seems only to happen with other distros. :-) When you take a thousand yard(or meter if you prefer) view of the project as a whole, it is pretty amazing where gentoo is today considering the age of this project. I only hope that I will some day be able to add contributions to this most excellent project. (Need a bit more skill yet before I am confident enough in my own programming abilities to contribute...)

Thanks to all for the great work. I'd still be using Slackware if it weren't for your work. ;-)
--David

> 
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Michael wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:58:56 +0100
> Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@rug.ac.be> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 05:35:19PM +0100, M. Zuelsdorff wrote:
> > > I am following the the discussion in the gentoo-dev group for more than a
> > > year now. All I see is "a problem with this" and "a problem with that".
> > > Some days ago, something even appeared to be "really fucked up". My
> > > question: When do you expect Gentoo to become a final usable release?
> >
> > It is very normal that you frequently see problems arise on the mailinglist
> > but rarely successtories. This is because of human nature: we will swiftly
> > ask/seek for help (and the Gentoo Mailinglists are a good place to ask for
> > help) but rarely just mail to tell it works...
> 
> You are so right!
> You ever listen to people talk on the bus?
> allways complaining about something :P
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 

-- 
 |\_/|
 (\ /)
  ) (//^\
 ( M )
(_)_(_)

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

RE: [gentoo-dev] final release ?

[Riyad Kalla]

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but after this locking up with the dual
P4s is taken care of I think that is the only pressing issue still on
the board... Everyone else is just having fun with USE vars :)

I have NO idea what is in the bug database, I'm just going off of what
this dev list was focusing on as of recent.

NOTE: I'm not on the team, they release it whenever they want. I'll
trade stability for "timely" release any day. I can't use a buggy
release hardly as much as I can use a stable late release :)

Best,
-Riyad

-----Original Message-----
From: M. Zuelsdorff [mailto:micha@dolbyco.de] 
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 9:35 AM
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] final release ?


I am following the the discussion in the gentoo-dev group for more than
a year 
now. All I see is "a problem with this" and "a problem with that". Some
days 
ago, something even appeared to be "really fucked up". My question: When
do 
you expect Gentoo to become a final usable release?

Best regards.

michael

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Problem reporting (WAS: final release ?)

[Arthur Britto]

On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 08:58, Sven Vermeulen wrote: 
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 05:35:19PM +0100, M. Zuelsdorff wrote:
> > I am following the the discussion in the gentoo-dev group for more than a
> > year now. All I see is "a problem with this" and "a problem with that".
> > Some days ago, something even appeared to be "really fucked up". My
> > question: When do you expect Gentoo to become a final usable release?
> 
> It is very normal that you frequently see problems arise on the mailinglist
> but rarely successtories. This is because of human nature: we will swiftly
> ask/seek for help (and the Gentoo Mailinglists are a good place to ask for
> help) but rarely just mail to tell it works...
> 
> Think of it: if you emerge 10 tools, and 9 of them work flawlessly, you won't
> mail the mailinglist about those 9 tools do you? No, you're going to mail
> about the 10th tool that doesn't work.

You've just highlighted one of the biggest problems with Gentoo: manual
problem discovery and resolution.  When a package breaks, someone must
(1) manually discover it, (2) search mailing lists for Gentoo and the
application, (3) search the forums for Gentoo and the application, (4)
attempt reasonable diagnostics to insure the problem is not just with
their system, (5) if they are competent they might try to solve the
problem, and (6) share their problem with the community.

Currently, the latest gtkspell ebuild is broken for me.  I assume it
worked for the person who modified it last.  This hidden breakage
remains until manually discovered and shared.

Installing Java for Galeon for 1.4rc1, was a nightmare.  The user
documentation tells you are on your own if you use the latest sun-jdk. 
Yet, the latest is all that will work.  So users go on to try and fail
with sun-jdk-1.3.  The user docs should be authorative or have warnings
that they are not.

Checking the mailing lists is hard if the problem is not new.  Search
engines don't sort by most recent articles first.  Additionally, threads
break on month boundries, making following a thread not much fun.

BTW, checking the forums did revealed a solution for Java.

I've only mentioned a couple of the problems I had, but I ran into many
more that I haven't had time to properly investigate and report. :(

It seems to me, to make Gentoo a painless solution, supporting so much
customization, an automated problem detection system must be put in
place.  For example, Mozilla has tinderboxs that report when certain
builds break.  Additionally, some sort of automated user feedback system
would be good too.  This system might report the configuration for
compile failures/successes and package test results as well.

Unfortunately, the nature of source based installs (slow turn around
time) exacerbates user fustration and makes problem diagnostics and
resolution time consuming.

Hopefully some attention will be applied to this with the benefits of a
higher quality distribution and less wasted time for everyone.

Sticking with Gentoo :),

-Arthur



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Problem reporting (WAS: final release ?)

[Daniel Robbins]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1542 bytes --]

On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 23:01, Arthur Britto wrote:
> You've just highlighted one of the biggest problems with Gentoo: manual
> problem discovery and resolution.  When a package breaks, someone must
> (1) manually discover it, (2) search mailing lists for Gentoo and the
> application, (3) search the forums for Gentoo and the application, (4)
> attempt reasonable diagnostics to insure the problem is not just with
> their system, (5) if they are competent they might try to solve the
> problem, and (6) share their problem with the community.

We are taking significant steps to "fix" this, starting with better
handling of our bugs (and more accountability of how they are handled)
on bugs.gentoo.org. Several developers including myself are now fully
caught up on bugs -- unresolved bugs get checked daily for new comments,
etc.

One of the major things that has caused this "manual discovery" problem
is our extremely rapid growth, which resulted in many developers getting
overwhelmed with bugs. Once a developer has more than 50 bugs on his
plate, it becomes a bit overwhelming to keep tabs on all of them. If
they don't get addressed quickly, then they can linger for longer than
is acceptable. Our dev team is growing every week to address our rapidly
growing user-base. (See our Gentoo Weekly Newsletter, bottom, for devs
who were added in the last week.)

Just wanted to chime in and say "we're workin' on it!" :)

Best Regards,

-- 
Daniel Robbins
Chief Architect, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] final release?

[David Hunter]

    I just thought I would take the time to make the positive reply. 
GENTOO is the best distro I have ever used. I'm a BSD guy, and M$ (hate 
to say it) but Gentoo is good enough that my primary workstation at home 
is now gentoo, with XP on my secondary box.
It just works. I understand it, there is no crazy archane structures, it 
just works. I used to use SuSE but as often as not, if I could do it on 
XP I would. Now, I only use XP as a back up.


Dave



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] final release?

[Denis Shcherbakov]

Dave, I couldn't agree more.

I never tried BSD myself, but I did try to coexist with Redhat and then
SuSE and both left a bitter aftertaste. :)  Whereas Redhat is sort of
optimizable, SuSE was not very tractable in that regard.  But sadly
enough, both Redhat and SuSE are slowly but surely approaching Windoze.

With Gentoo, not only can you tune and performance-optimize your box, you
retain the feel and stability that is always advertised about Linux.

I am getting brave enough to consider the idea of using Gentoo to deliver
laptop-aided presentations for scientific seminars.  I haven't researched
that topic very much yet, but this is where stability and dependability
would count the most for me - the ability not to worry that my Powerpoint
in Windoze will crash during a talk.  I haven't seen anyone present with a
Linux laptop yet...  Any of you tried it?  I'd love to know!!

Many thanks to Gentoo again...  and Happy New Year to all :)

Denis



On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, David Hunter wrote:

    I just thought I would take the time to make the positive reply.
GENTOO is the best distro I have ever used. I'm a BSD guy, and M$ (hate
to say it) but Gentoo is good enough that my primary workstation at home
is now gentoo, with XP on my secondary box.
It just works. I understand it, there is no crazy archane structures, it
just works. I used to use SuSE but as often as not, if I could do it on
XP I would. Now, I only use XP as a back up.


Dave



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] final release?

[Regis Smith]

On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 09:09:08PM -0500, Denis Shcherbakov wrote:
> [...]
> I am getting brave enough to consider the idea of using Gentoo to deliver
> laptop-aided presentations for scientific seminars.  I haven't researched
> that topic very much yet, but this is where stability and dependability
> would count the most for me - the ability not to worry that my Powerpoint
> in Windoze will crash during a talk.  I haven't seen anyone present with a
> Linux laptop yet...  Any of you tried it?  I'd love to know!!

If you have a laptop with the proper video outputs, doing a
presentation in Linux is essentially the same as doing one in Windows,
isn't it?  Just run xdvi or gv (or whatever you use) full screen.  If
you need the cutesie powerpoint effects, I believe there is an
extension for TeX that produces PDFs with such effects that acrobat
can render (though the last time I tried acrobat for Linux (not
recently) it liked to crash).  Or just use Kpresenter if you use KDE.
As far as stability goes, xdvi and gv can't be touched (IMO).  mgv has
a nice full screen mode, but I've seen it crash before on certain
PDFs.

By the way, I would never do a powerpoint unless it was required, but
I have to admit I've never seen ppt crash during a live presentation.

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] final release?

[Bart Verwilst]

On Wednesday 01 January 2003 03:09, Denis Shcherbakov wrote:
||  I am getting brave enough to consider the idea of using Gentoo to deliver
||  laptop-aided presentations for scientific seminars.  I haven't researched
||  that topic very much yet, but this is where stability and dependability
||  would count the most for me - the ability not to worry that my Powerpoint
||  in Windoze will crash during a talk.  I haven't seen anyone present with
|| a Linux laptop yet...  Any of you tried it?  I'd love to know!!

I presented my thesis last year with kpresenter, went just great!
(even although i was using a CVS version of koffice at that time ;o) 

-- 
Bart Verwilst
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Gent, Belgium

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] final release?

[Matthew J. Turk]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 506 bytes --]

On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 13:23, Bart Verwilst wrote:
> I presented my thesis last year with kpresenter, went just great!
> (even although i was using a CVS version of koffice at that time ;o) 

An alternative, if it's pretty math heavy or you don't like kpresenter,
is to use FoilTeX and then present in PDF format using Acrobat's
full-screen option.  I did that this summer and found it to be very
quick and easy, as well as professional looking.




mjt
-- 
Matthew J. Turk
satai@gentoo.org

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] final release?

[Bart Verwilst]

On Wednesday 01 January 2003 19:31, Matthew J. Turk wrote:
||  On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 13:23, Bart Verwilst wrote:
||  > I presented my thesis last year with kpresenter, went just great!
||  > (even although i was using a CVS version of koffice at that time ;o)
||
||  An alternative, if it's pretty math heavy or you don't like kpresenter,
||  is to use FoilTeX and then present in PDF format using Acrobat's
||  full-screen option.  I did that this summer and found it to be very
||  quick and easy, as well as professional looking.

About the math heavy thingy, you can always embed formula's from kformula 
(which is also a part of Koffice inside kpresenter ( i think ) ;o)

-- 
Bart Verwilst
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Gent, Belgium

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] final release?

[Denis Shcherbakov]

No, none of them Windoze-like desktops such as K or Gnome.  I
personally prefer Fluxbox.  So no K stuff.  I'm only interested in
anything TeX :)

thank you for the TeX suggestions!  I will look into it more.

Denis


On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Bart Verwilst wrote:

On Wednesday 01 January 2003 19:31, Matthew J. Turk wrote:
||  On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 13:23, Bart Verwilst wrote:
||  > I presented my thesis last year with kpresenter, went just great!
||  > (even although i was using a CVS version of koffice at that time ;o)
||
||  An alternative, if it's pretty math heavy or you don't like kpresenter,
||  is to use FoilTeX and then present in PDF format using Acrobat's
||  full-screen option.  I did that this summer and found it to be very
||  quick and easy, as well as professional looking.

About the math heavy thingy, you can always embed formula's from kformula
(which is also a part of Koffice inside kpresenter ( i think ) ;o)

-- 
Bart Verwilst
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Gent, Belgium

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] final release?

[Matt Meola]

On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 12:25, David Hunter wrote:
>     I just thought I would take the time to make the positive reply. 
> GENTOO is the best distro I have ever used. I'm a BSD guy, and M$ (hate 
> to say it) but Gentoo is good enough that my primary workstation at home 
> is now gentoo, with XP on my secondary box.

Well, I'd like to chime in here too; I come from FreeBSD, and while I
still have a place for it in my heart, Gentoo Linux is right beside it.

> It just works. I understand it, there is no crazy archane structures, it 
> just works. I used to use SuSE but as often as not, if I could do it on 
> XP I would. Now, I only use XP as a back up.

emerge just rocks; it is the BSD ports system as it should have been.


-- 

________________________________________________________________________
Matt Meola 

                   AFØD
Bailey, Colorado 

               Home Page


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list