From: Henti Smith <bain@tcsn.co.za>
To: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@gentoo.org>
Cc: veldy@veldy.net, aurelien@gouny.org, kdolkas@telecom.ntua.gr,
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org, manson@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:17:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021217201714.0d651310.bain@tcsn.co.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1040141423.9467.44.camel@inventor>
On 17 Dec 2002 09:10:23 -0700
Daniel Robbins <drobbins@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I really dislike this whole theme of finding the "culprit," since I
> don't think it's helpful. If you're interested, you can view the
> ChangeLogs here:
A typical western attitude. Something is broken/wrong find somebody to blame.
Addapt an eastern attidute. Something is broken/wrong fix it no need to blame anybody
Henti Smith
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-17 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-17 13:18 [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2002-12-17 13:41 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 13:41 ` Jaeggi, Daniel M.
2002-12-17 13:56 ` konstantinos Dolkas
2002-12-17 13:49 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 13:53 ` Aurélien Gouny
2002-12-17 14:09 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 14:55 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 16:10 ` Daniel Robbins
2002-12-17 16:15 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 18:17 ` Henti Smith [this message]
2002-12-17 16:15 ` Adam Voigt
2002-12-17 18:35 ` Henti Smith
2002-12-17 16:20 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 22:42 ` Aurelien Gouny
2002-12-17 16:26 ` Riyad Kalla
2002-12-17 14:22 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-17 14:27 ` wes chow
2002-12-17 14:30 ` Georgios Kylafas
2002-12-17 14:38 ` [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY messed " Pat Double
2002-12-17 14:59 ` konstantinos Dolkas
2002-12-17 14:57 ` Pat Double
2002-12-17 15:13 ` konstantinos Dolkas
2002-12-17 15:09 ` Georgios Kylafas
[not found] ` <200212171612.08365.icemaze@tiscalinet.it>
2002-12-17 15:23 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Quick and dirty system rescue (was: portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?) Georgios Kylafas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-17 19:40 [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? Sean P. Kane
2002-12-18 9:28 ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021217201714.0d651310.bain@tcsn.co.za \
--to=bain@tcsn.co.za \
--cc=aurelien@gouny.org \
--cc=drobbins@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=kdolkas@telecom.ntua.gr \
--cc=manson@gentoo.org \
--cc=veldy@veldy.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox