From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15038 invoked by uid 1002); 16 Dec 2002 21:06:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 22465 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 21:06:45 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:04:21 +0100 From: Maik Schreiber To: Gentoo-Dev , gentoo-core Message-ID: <20021216210420.GA11372@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> Mail-Followup-To: Gentoo-Dev , gentoo-core References: <3DFE1BD9.5090004@foser.warande.net> <20021216203412.GB8276@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> <1040071802.15389.9.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1040071802.15389.9.camel@nosferatu.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Sender: 520075895375-0001@t-dialin.net Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? X-Archives-Salt: 9244df4c-f30e-4089-95a9-ae9c0f351186 X-Archives-Hash: 70db38e40f382e6e5e6fa7f133df9d8e > Mozilla 1.2.1 is marked as testing, cause there are still some minor > issues with it. Then, if anybody did mind checking, it do not > depend on x11-libs/xft, but compile it internally. I have taken > much time to have its Xft2.0 'contained' ... you will see that its > not even libXft.so or libXrender.so anymore, but libXft_moz.so and > libXrender_moz.so ... This change seems to fix some issues that > some people had with it not starting, so it may be marked stable > in a bit if all goes well ... Sorry if this was causing confusion with you, but Mozilla was just an example. The discussion was about marking an otherwise stable package as "unstable" because some of its dependencies were marked "unstable". -- Maik Schreiber, Gentoo Linux Developer http://www.gentoo.org mailto:blizzy@gentoo.org -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list