From: Maik Schreiber <blizzy@gentoo.org>
To: Gentoo-Dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>, gentoo-core <gentoo-core@gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ?
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:04:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021216210420.GA11372@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1040071802.15389.9.camel@nosferatu.lan>
> Mozilla 1.2.1 is marked as testing, cause there are still some minor
> issues with it. Then, if anybody did mind checking, it do not
> depend on x11-libs/xft, but compile it internally. I have taken
> much time to have its Xft2.0 'contained' ... you will see that its
> not even libXft.so or libXrender.so anymore, but libXft_moz.so and
> libXrender_moz.so ... This change seems to fix some issues that
> some people had with it not starting, so it may be marked stable
> in a bit if all goes well ...
Sorry if this was causing confusion with you, but Mozilla was just an example. The discussion was about marking an otherwise stable package
as "unstable" because some of its dependencies were marked "unstable".
--
Maik Schreiber, Gentoo Linux Developer
http://www.gentoo.org
mailto:blizzy@gentoo.org
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-16 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-15 12:56 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? Rainer Groesslinger
2002-12-15 18:43 ` Saverio Vigni
2002-12-15 18:03 ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 18:30 ` foser
2002-12-16 20:34 ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 20:38 ` Jon Portnoy
2002-12-16 20:43 ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 20:46 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" " Matthew Walker
2002-12-16 20:50 ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 20:50 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" " Martin Schlemmer
2002-12-16 21:04 ` Maik Schreiber [this message]
2002-12-16 21:05 ` Martin Schlemmer
2002-12-17 1:05 ` foser
2002-12-17 0:26 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" " Matthew Walker
2002-12-17 1:47 ` foser
2002-12-17 0:56 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo &quot;stable&quot; " Matthew Walker
2002-12-17 10:25 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" " Maik Schreiber
2002-12-17 14:12 ` foser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021216210420.GA11372@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de \
--to=blizzy@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-core@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox