From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6111 invoked by uid 1002); 16 Dec 2002 20:52:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 11812 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 20:52:39 -0000 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:50:16 +0100 From: Maik Schreiber To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-core Message-ID: <20021216205016.GA10259@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org, gentoo-core References: <3DFE1BD9.5090004@foser.warande.net> <20021216203412.GB8276@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> <4132.216.190.203.130.1040071561.squirrel@squirrelmail.kydance.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4132.216.190.203.130.1040071561.squirrel@squirrelmail.kydance.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Sender: 520075895375-0001@t-dialin.net Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? X-Archives-Salt: 17f7b249-8bf0-43d6-a64d-f49bee1ec8e1 X-Archives-Hash: d46d0d43b364786193d0a331307a464f >> Er? If the dependencies are marked unstable and the package isn't, nobody >> (or nobody only using stable keywords, I should say) can install it unless >> the dependencies are marked stable... >> > > True. But as soon as the dependencies get marked stable, they /will/ be able > to install it. Yes, and purely automagically. No work on the package itself would need to be done (ie. marking it as "stable"). -- Maik Schreiber, Gentoo Linux Developer http://www.gentoo.org mailto:blizzy@gentoo.org -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list