From: Maik Schreiber <blizzy@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org, gentoo-core <gentoo-core@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ?
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 21:43:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021216204303.GC8276@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0212161537410.22911-100000@cerberus.localhost>
>> So again, there's no point in masking a package "unstable" just because its dependencies are "unstable".
>
> Er? If the dependencies are marked unstable and the package isn't, nobody
> (or nobody only using stable keywords, I should say) can install it unless
> the dependencies are marked stable...
Exactly, that's what is intended. So you simply don't gain anything with marking the package itself "unstable" as well, except for more
work.
--
Maik Schreiber, Gentoo Linux Developer
http://www.gentoo.org
mailto:blizzy@gentoo.org
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-16 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-15 12:56 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? Rainer Groesslinger
2002-12-15 18:43 ` Saverio Vigni
2002-12-15 18:03 ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 18:30 ` foser
2002-12-16 20:34 ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 20:38 ` Jon Portnoy
2002-12-16 20:43 ` Maik Schreiber [this message]
2002-12-16 20:46 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" " Matthew Walker
2002-12-16 20:50 ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 20:50 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" " Martin Schlemmer
2002-12-16 21:04 ` Maik Schreiber
2002-12-16 21:05 ` Martin Schlemmer
2002-12-17 1:05 ` foser
2002-12-17 0:26 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" " Matthew Walker
2002-12-17 1:47 ` foser
2002-12-17 0:56 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo &quot;stable&quot; " Matthew Walker
2002-12-17 10:25 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" " Maik Schreiber
2002-12-17 14:12 ` foser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-15 14:07 Pieter Van den Abeele
2002-12-15 14:24 ` Maik Schreiber
[not found] <DDEPKFNMNPHHLGFONDKMKEGLCBAA.rainer.groesslinger@gmx.net>
2002-12-15 14:34 ` Pieter Van den Abeele
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021216204303.GC8276@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de \
--to=blizzy@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-core@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox