public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong <vo.chi.cong-linux@is.titech.ac.jp>
To: mcummings@datanode.net
Cc: gtg663h@mail.gatech.edu, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] AUTOCLEAN="yes" destroyed my system (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage wants to downgrade)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 23:09:27 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021215.230927.39170640.vo.chi.cong@is.titech.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021212184133.GB11061@gnosis.datanode.net>

Recently portage behaves really strangely on my system.
When I do "emerge clean", Portage trys to clean newest packages
For example with phoenix-bin:

# emerge net-www/phoenix-bin
SUCCESS
# emerge net-www/phoenix-bin -p 
[ebuild   R  ] net-www/phoenix-bin-0.4-r2 
# emerge net-www/phoenix-bin -cp

>>> These are the packages that I would unmerge:

 net-www/phoenix-bin
    selected: 0.4-r2
   protected: 20021121
     omitted: none

And the problem is that this happened with sys-apps/portage itself,
i.e, after upgrade previous version to portage-2.0.45-r5, portage
cleaned sys-apps/portage-2.0.45-r5 ( it tried to kept
sys-apps/portage-2.0.45-r4) and portage got broken. Same things
happened with almost all packages: gcc, glibc, xfree ....

Now I am forced to put AUTOCLEAN="no" in /etc/make.conf .

/ Cong

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-16  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-12  0:32 [gentoo-dev] Portage wants to downgrade Bob Thomas
2002-12-12 13:28 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-12-12 17:48   ` Bob Thomas
2002-12-12 18:13     ` Michael Cummings
2002-12-12 18:17       ` Bob Thomas
2002-12-16  0:24         ` J Robert Ray
     [not found]       ` <3DF8D281.2080803@mail.gatech.edu>
2002-12-12 18:41         ` Michael Cummings
2002-12-15 14:09           ` Cong [this message]
2002-12-16  7:36             ` [gentoo-dev] AUTOCLEAN="yes" destroyed my system (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage wants to downgrade) George Shapovalov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021215.230927.39170640.vo.chi.cong@is.titech.ac.jp \
    --to=vo.chi.cong-linux@is.titech.ac.jp \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gtg663h@mail.gatech.edu \
    --cc=mcummings@datanode.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox