* [gentoo-dev] Why does emerge give up too easily?
@ 2002-12-01 12:28 Peter Ruskin
2002-12-01 14:15 ` foser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Ruskin @ 2002-12-01 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
# emerge -pu world
These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
Calculating world dependencies /
emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=x11-libs/gtk+-2.1.2" (from
ebuild / net-www/mozilla-1.2 merge) have been masked.
...but there *are* other packages that could be emerged :-(
Peter
--
Gentoo Linux 1.4 (Portage 2.0.44 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.1,
glibc-2.3.1-r2)). KDE: 3.0.99 (KDE 3.1 RC3) Qt: 3.1.0
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+ 512MB. Kernel: 2.4.20-win4lin. GCC 3.2.1
Linux user #275590 (http://counter.li.org/). up 1:10.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Why does emerge give up too easily?
2002-12-01 12:28 [gentoo-dev] Why does emerge give up too easily? Peter Ruskin
@ 2002-12-01 14:15 ` foser
2002-12-01 18:19 ` Peter Ruskin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: foser @ 2002-12-01 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Peter Ruskin wrote:
> # emerge -pu world
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
>
> Calculating world dependencies /
>
> emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=x11-libs/gtk+-2.1.2" (from
> ebuild / net-www/mozilla-1.2 merge) have been masked.
>
> ...but there *are* other packages that could be emerged :-(
>
USE=-gtk2 emerge mozilla
The gtk2 port needs some unstable stuff, which i wouldn't recommend
right now.
And emerge giving up: what is the use of installing other stuff when you
don't have one dep.
- foser
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Why does emerge give up too easily?
2002-12-01 14:15 ` foser
@ 2002-12-01 18:19 ` Peter Ruskin
2002-12-01 18:18 ` foser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Ruskin @ 2002-12-01 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Sunday 01 Dec 2002 14:15, foser wrote:
> Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > # emerge -pu world
> >
> > These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
> >
> > Calculating world dependencies /
> >
> > emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=x11-libs/gtk+-2.1.2" (from
> > ebuild / net-www/mozilla-1.2 merge) have been masked.
> >
> > ...but there *are* other packages that could be emerged :-(
>
> USE=-gtk2 emerge mozilla
Thanks ... but see below
>
> The gtk2 port needs some unstable stuff, which i wouldn't recommend
> right now.
>
>
> And emerge giving up: what is the use of installing other stuff when
> you don't have one dep.
>
# emerge -pu world
These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[ebuild U ] net-www/mozilla-1.2
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gconf-1.0.8-r4
[ebuild U ] net-www/galeon-1.2.7
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/libgnomeui-2.0.6-r1
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gdm-2.4.0.12-r1
[ebuild U ] dev-util/kdevelop-3.0_alpha2
[ebuild U ] app-editors/nano-1.0.9-r2
[ebuild U ] dev-perl/XML-RegExp-0.03-r1
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/libieee1284-0.2.1
[ebuild U ] media-gfx/sane-backends-1.0.9
[ebuild U ] media-gfx/sane-frontends-1.0.9
# emerge -u world
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 11) net-www/mozilla-1.2 to /
>>> md5 ;-) mozilla-source-1.2.tar.bz2
>>> md5 ;-) fcpackage.2_0.tar.gz
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking mozilla-source-1.2.tar.bz2
>>> Unpacking fcpackage.2_0.tar.gz
* Applying mozilla-1.2-branch-update.patch.bz2...
* Failed Patch: mozilla-1.2-branch-update.patch.bz2!
*
* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
*
/var/tmp/portage/mozilla-1.2/temp/mozilla-1.2-branch-update.patch.bz2-30030.out
!!! ERROR: net-www/mozilla-1.2 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 300, Exitcode 0
!!! Failed Patch: mozilla-1.2-branch-update.patch.bz2!
My point is that I will probably be able to emerge, for example,
sane-backends separately, but if the first package in "These are the
packages that I would merge, in order" fails, the `emerge -u world`
command is thereafter useless. Why won't it skip failures?
Peter
--
Gentoo Linux 1.4 (Portage 2.0.44 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.1,
glibc-2.3.1-r2)). KDE: 3.0.99 (KDE 3.1 RC3) Qt: 3.1.0
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+ 512MB. Kernel: 2.4.20-win4lin. GCC 3.2.1
Linux user #275590 (http://counter.li.org/). up 6:55.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Why does emerge give up too easily?
2002-12-01 18:19 ` Peter Ruskin
@ 2002-12-01 18:18 ` foser
[not found] ` <200212020913.42688.tharkun@upb.de>
2002-12-02 18:14 ` Alexander Gretencord
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: foser @ 2002-12-01 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Peter Ruskin wrote:
> My point is that I will probably be able to emerge, for example,
> sane-backends separately, but if the first package in "These are the
> packages that I would merge, in order" fails, the `emerge -u world`
> command is thereafter useless. Why won't it skip failures?
>
Because the other packages may still depend on it (eg. Galeon-1.2.7
depends on mozilla-1.2).
If you choose to use unstable stuff atm you have to stop using -u world,
because it most likely will downgrade stuff.
- foser
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <200212020913.42688.tharkun@upb.de>]
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Why does emerge give up too easily?
[not found] ` <200212020913.42688.tharkun@upb.de>
@ 2002-12-02 12:54 ` foser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: foser @ 2002-12-02 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Alexander Gretencord wrote:
> You are right, _may_, so portage should check _if_ the failed ebuild is a dep
> for a package down in the chain and if not continue with it.
Maybe, from a portage pov i don't think that's easy to implement. Maybe
in an ideal situation, but then you should also know what packages
failed and why and which packages are affected.
> This has nothing
> to do with unstable, as gentoo is bleeding edge this can even and has
> happened to "stable" packages...
Bleeding edge is no excuse for failing packages, fyi mozilla-1.2 is
masked and so is galeon-1.2.7 .
- foser
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Why does emerge give up too easily?
2002-12-01 18:18 ` foser
[not found] ` <200212020913.42688.tharkun@upb.de>
@ 2002-12-02 18:14 ` Alexander Gretencord
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Gretencord @ 2002-12-02 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Sunday 01 December 2002 19:18, foser wrote:
> Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > My point is that I will probably be able to emerge, for example,
> > sane-backends separately, but if the first package in "These are the
> > packages that I would merge, in order" fails, the `emerge -u world`
> > command is thereafter useless. Why won't it skip failures?
>
> Because the other packages may still depend on it (eg. Galeon-1.2.7
> depends on mozilla-1.2).
But then portage should be able to check if an ebuild in the chain has the
failed package as a dep and only leave those deps and that ebuild alone and
merge the rest which does not have a failed package as a dep (or a package
that will fail because of the failed dep)
Alex
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-02 18:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-01 12:28 [gentoo-dev] Why does emerge give up too easily? Peter Ruskin
2002-12-01 14:15 ` foser
2002-12-01 18:19 ` Peter Ruskin
2002-12-01 18:18 ` foser
[not found] ` <200212020913.42688.tharkun@upb.de>
2002-12-02 12:54 ` foser
2002-12-02 18:14 ` Alexander Gretencord
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox