From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14057 invoked by uid 1002); 2 Dec 2002 02:21:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 14048 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 02:21:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 02:32:43 -0700 From: Gontran Zepda To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20021129093243.GA5524@rythm.gontran.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux 2.4.19-xfs-r2 X-Uptime: 02:29:29 up 2:05, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Resent-From: gontran@rythm.gontran.net Resent-Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 19:21:00 -0700 Resent-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Resent-Message-Id: <20021202022100.C3046223E69@rythm.gontran.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] bioperl X-Archives-Salt: fdd96272-115c-4653-bf78-7d4124ad923f X-Archives-Hash: f6b21553a7590e0a460fbb78af6e4e3c I'm working on an ebuild for the current stable release of bioperl ( http://www.bioperl.org, new stable ver 1.2 is due just after new years ), it's dev-perl dependencies that aren't currently in portage, as well as a cvs ebuild (fingers crossed). If this may be duplicating efforts that any of you may be aware of, please let me know. Rgds, Gontran -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list