From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RDNS_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from heather.int.siteman.co.uk (unknown [212.19.79.226]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8133FAC8C3 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:01:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: by heather.int.siteman.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 32600123935; Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:01:03 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:01:02 +0100 From: Mark Gordon To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo email list posting changes Message-Id: <20021025120102.7eb3337f.mark.gt@flash-gordon.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <20021025021750.1fe7ba4d.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> References: <200210241159.50320.trance@gentoo.org> <200210242241.05788.gentoo-user@devrieze.net> <20021025021750.1fe7ba4d.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> Organization: Not very often X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.5claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; ) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 8868e93f-a81c-483c-9360-ac8adebd3c1f X-Archives-Hash: b8a020a70a3cbc54063c196b19ca3b7e On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 02:17:50 +0200 Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:41:05 +0200 > Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > > Is there actually some moderator now? > > > > If this message arrives, then there are moderators. In fact I've > already had a message moderated. > But something I wonder with this new policy is: "does it still makes > sense to appear on "gmame" (a NNTP interface to various mailing > list)?" I consult the list on gmame, because it is easier for doing it > at home and at work, but if I can't post anymore without disturbing > moderators, I will surely subscribe. And I think I'm not alone in that > case, so maybe gmame is obsolete now. I was using gmane, but I've now subscribed to the mailing lists instead to get around this. Fortunately, the reasons I wanted NNTP access to the list no longer apply to me, so this is not a problem for me. However, if post only subscriptions can be sorted (something I understand is being looked into) it would allow people to set up full access through gmane. -- Mark Gordon