From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jsmith@kcco.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from yatima.home.jean.nu (24-148-53-201.na.21stcentury.net [24.148.53.201])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4727EAC855
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:00:32 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from yatima.home.jean.nu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by yatima.home.jean.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7B751B649B; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:02:27 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Jean-Michel Smith <jsmith@kcco.com>
To: Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com>, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo email list posting changes
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:02:27 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
References: <200210241159.50320.trance@gentoo.org> <200210242216.51162.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com>
In-Reply-To: <200210242216.51162.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200210242002.27396.jsmith@kcco.com>
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: dab05878-73aa-4960-a481-98188cefd90b
X-Archives-Hash: 244c2d2144ee14c480df460040bedfa2

On Thursday 24 October 2002 04:16 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:

> Excellent!  Does that we can have munging back, so we only have to hit
> "Reply" to reply to the list?

well, since the munging fixed the problem of full mail boxes spamming the=
=20
list, and those mailboxes (and IIRC the sender of the resulting bounce=20
messages) are subscribed to the list, I don't think going to a=20
subscriber-only mailing list would prevent that problem for returning if =
they=20
turn munging back off.

Jean.