From: Matt Beland <matt@rearviewmirror.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: When is Gentoo 1.4 going to be released?
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:15:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021022191549.GA24779@rearviewmirror.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DB59715.455ADC02@yahoo.com>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 02:21:09PM -0400, 3.2.3 wrote:
> whoa right there. a lot of people are on crack, too. especially where
> concerns a bunch wondering when someone is going to hurry up and give
> them something for free.
Wrong. We're not asking for the Gentoo team to hurry up and give us our
free candy. We want the Gentoo team to let us know when they're going to
let us take full advantage of the portage system again. Frankly, I (and
I suspect most others) could care less about the 1.4 release in and of
itself. Sure, a new version of the compiler and so on would be nice, but
I can get that on my own if necessary. The problem is that the portage
tree is frozen waiting for 1.4, and has been for some time.
Do a 'grep freeze /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask' sometime. That's
probably an inaccurate count - on the low side - and I see 14 ebuilds
that are masked waiting for the freeze to be over. How many others are
not even in the tree? I see a number of the "freeze" comments indicating
they were only added to the tree for bugfix testing or because the new
build fixes a major bug.
> enough software in this world is tossed over the fence according to a
> schedule. i don't need any more software that was developed to a
> schedule. i've got enought of that at work. i need software that is
> actually ready when it is ready, whenever that is. i'm glad there is
> some. eye on the ball, not some bean counter's stopwatch.
Well, see, here's the thing - that's not what we're asking for. We can't
really participate in the internal development - the bugs are available,
but we don't know what's being done about them. We don't know if our
work would be a duplication of effort, or a wrong track, or not really
useful. So we *can't* help fix the problems. At the same time, we get no
communication on how things are progressing - are we getting close? Is
it months away? Has the entire development team gone on vacation?
I need software that's "actually ready when it is ready" too. So when
I'm dealing with an Open Source software distribution, I have to wonder
why releases are so far apart and include so little community
communication and involvement.
--
Matt Beland
matt@rearviewmirror.org
http://www.rearviewmirror.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-22 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-21 15:25 [gentoo-dev] When is Gentoo 1.4 going to be released? Iago Sineiro
2002-10-21 20:31 ` Michael Boman
2002-10-21 23:25 ` Jyrinx
2002-10-22 1:48 ` Jean-Michel Smith
2002-10-22 7:08 ` Iago Sineiro
2002-10-22 9:51 ` Luke Maurer
2002-10-22 13:45 ` Rigo Ketelings
2002-10-22 14:49 ` Luke Maurer
2002-10-21 20:33 ` Evan Read
2002-10-22 15:28 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-10-22 17:15 ` [gentoo-dev] " 3.2.3
2002-10-22 19:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefano Peluchetti
2002-10-22 17:55 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-10-22 18:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " 3.2.3
2002-10-22 19:15 ` Matt Beland [this message]
2002-10-22 19:43 ` Tom Syroid
2002-10-22 20:06 ` Matt Beland
2002-10-23 12:13 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-10-22 20:42 ` Stefano Peluchetti
2002-10-21 20:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Fred Van Andel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-23 16:20 [gentoo-dev] " Thomas T. Veldhouse
2002-10-27 20:25 ` Thomas M. Beaudry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021022191549.GA24779@rearviewmirror.org \
--to=matt@rearviewmirror.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox