From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_REJECT, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from shockwave.systems.pipex.net (shockwave.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.9]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8DCAC427 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:20:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from penguin.ruskin (81-86-215-30.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.215.30]) by shockwave.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025CC16000D28 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:20:11 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Peter Ruskin Reply-To: aoyu93@NOSPAM.dsl.pipex.com To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!! Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:20:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200210162312.53538.tclark@telia.com> <877kgh6lp4.fsf@gentoo.shacknet.nu> <200210171923.38732.tclark@bredband.net> In-Reply-To: <200210171923.38732.tclark@bredband.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200210172220.05331.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 5b7207ee-1e76-4df0-90a2-1cf8e554e83f X-Archives-Hash: d585d63d498385e9b48cfc155e2e80a9 On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 18:36, Tony Clark wrote: > On Thursday 17 October 2002 19.04, Matthew Kennedy wrote: > > Tony Clark writes: > > > > Certainly not. I'm talking of a fresh gentoo 1.4_rc1 install. > > > > No gcc <3 library there. > > > > > > That makes me feel a little better knowing I am not alone. GCC2 > > > has been no where near this drive. I fdisked it and mke2fs on > > > the weekend prior to installing 1.4-rc1. What I get is > > > tony@power flash-0.4.10 $ /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin > > > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library > > > /opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so > > > [/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so: undefined symbol: > > > __dso_handle] > > > > Okay, so what we have here is one fresh 1.4_rc1 install with > > netscape-flash and mozilla working "solid" and another fresh > > 1.4_rc1 install with netscape-flash and mozilla broken? > > I'm a little confused I must admit. I had flash working with > moz1.0.0 I upgraded to moz1.0.1 and flash broke. I am not sure if > was gplflash or macromedia working with moz1.0.0. Neither works with > moz1.0.1. Macromedia causes moz to crash and burn where as gplflash > crashes. I'm not sure if this means anything but macromedia does > work with konqueror. > > tony > I'm confused too now :-) I have 1.4beta, gcc-3.2, moz-1.1 (compiled with gcc-2.95.3 as per Paul de Vrieze's bugzilla #9016). gplflash didn't segfault, built OK but moz, konqui etc. couldn't see it so I got rid of it. netscape-flash (Macromedia) works well in moz-1.1 but not in konqueror. However, if I try to open a *.swf file from the file menu on moz, nothing happens. That worked on my 1.2 box - useful for saving flash files from madblast.com Peter -- Gentoo Linux 1.4 (Portage 2.0.40). KDE: 3.0.4 Qt: 3.0.5 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+ 512MB. Kernel: 2.4.19-win4lin. GCC 3.2 Linux user #275590 (http://counter.li.org/). up 5:20.