[gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Tony Clark]

I've just emerged 1.0.1 of mozilla after unmerging 1.0.0.  everytime time I go 
to www.theinquirer.net mozilla crashes.  I've removed my .mozilla directory 
and rebuilt it a couple of times.  The site is ok in knoqueror and was ok 
earlier today with mozilla.  My installed is very clean as I did a freash one 
on the weekend.

Any ideas?
tony
-- 
Contract ASIC and FPGA design.
Telephone
+46 702 894 667

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Tony Clark]

I've narrowed things down a little...well a lot i guess, unmerge 
netscape-flash and Mozilla doesn't crash, emerge it back in and it crashes 
again on the same site.

tony


On Wednesday 16 October 2002 23.12, Tony Clark wrote:
> I've just emerged 1.0.1 of mozilla after unmerging 1.0.0.  everytime time I
> go to www.theinquirer.net mozilla crashes.  I've removed my .mozilla
> directory and rebuilt it a couple of times.  The site is ok in knoqueror
> and was ok earlier today with mozilla.  My installed is very clean as I did
> a freash one on the weekend.
>
> Any ideas?
> tony

-- 
Contract ASIC and FPGA design.
Telephone
+46 702 894 667

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Alan]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:27:19PM +0200, Tony Clark wrote:
> I've narrowed things down a little...well a lot i guess, unmerge 
> netscape-flash and Mozilla doesn't crash, emerge it back in and it crashes 
> again on the same site.

Yea, that's what I thought it would be.  Precompiled plugins such as
flash or java have bad problems (read crashing) when they are compiled
with gcc 2.x and then run on a gcc 3.x system.  I can't wait until this
is all fixed though :) 

A solution that works for me is to use the codeweavers crossover plugin
program, which will let you run the windows version of flash on linux in
konq, mozilla, and netscape.  Hit www.codeweavers.com for details.  It's
only something like $25, and it'll make you feel good to support a linux
company :)

alan

-- 
Alan "Arcterex" <alan@ufies.org>   -=][=-   http://arcterex.net
"I used to herd dairy cows. Now I herd lusers. Apart from the isolation, I
think I preferred the cows. They were better conversation, easier to milk, and
if they annoyed me enough, I could shoot them and eat them." -Rodger Donaldson

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Tiago Pierezan Camargo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 588 bytes --]

On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 19:48, Alan wrote:
> A solution that works for me is to use the codeweavers crossover plugin
> program, which will let you run the windows version of flash on linux in
> konq, mozilla, and netscape.  Hit www.codeweavers.com for details.  It's
> only something like $25, and it'll make you feel good to support a linux
> company :)

	Crossover plugin is great. Although, I emerged gplflash recently, and
it is working gracefuly.
 

-- 
Tiago Pierezan Camargo
Telenova Research and Development Centre
www.telenova.com

"Talk and Work on the Internet"

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Spider]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 543 bytes --]

begin  quote
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:27:19 +0200
Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> wrote:

> I've narrowed things down a little...well a lot i guess, unmerge 
> netscape-flash and Mozilla doesn't crash, emerge it back in and it
> crashes again on the same site.
> 
> tony

a quick guess, you now use gcc 3.x ??  gcc 3.x causes flash to crash
with moz/netscape due to the brokenness of flash.

//Spider

--
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Pierre-Henri Jondot]

On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:30:53 +0200
Spider <spider@gentoo.org> wrote:

> begin  quote
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:27:19 +0200
> Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> wrote:
> 
> > I've narrowed things down a little...well a lot i guess, unmerge 
> > netscape-flash and Mozilla doesn't crash, emerge it back in and it
> > crashes again on the same site.
> > 
> > tony
> 
> a quick guess, you now use gcc 3.x ??  gcc 3.x causes flash to crash
> with moz/netscape due to the brokenness of flash.
> 
> //Spider
> 
> --
I am lucky then... I never had a problem with flash, either when I was using
gentoo 1.2, 1.3b and now 1.4_rc1.

 
*  net-www/netscape-flash
      Latest version available: 5.0.50
      Latest version installed: 5.0.50
      Homepage: http://www.macromedia.com
      Description: Macromedia Shockwave Flash Player

The only plugin that doesn't work for me is java, except when building from
source of course. But I am talking of mozilla 1.0 (-r3) there.

So mozilla 1.0-r3+netscape-flash 5.0.50 seem rock solid to me... 

I remember from testing that mozilla 1.1 wasn't so stable... but I have no
idea if the crashes I encountered came from flash...

Didn't test mozilla 1.0.1 for the moment.

-- 
Pierre-Henri Jondot <Pierre-Henri.Jondot@wanadoo.fr>
Page perso : http://perso.wanadoo.fr/phj

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Alan]

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:19:41AM +0200, Pierre-Henri Jondot wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:30:53 +0200
> Spider <spider@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > begin  quote
> > On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:27:19 +0200
> > Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I've narrowed things down a little...well a lot i guess, unmerge 
> > > netscape-flash and Mozilla doesn't crash, emerge it back in and it
> > > crashes again on the same site.
> > > 
> > > tony
> > 
> > a quick guess, you now use gcc 3.x ??  gcc 3.x causes flash to crash
> > with moz/netscape due to the brokenness of flash.
> > 
> > //Spider
> > 
> > --
> I am lucky then... I never had a problem with flash, either when I was using
> gentoo 1.2, 1.3b and now 1.4_rc1.
> 
>  
> *  net-www/netscape-flash
>       Latest version available: 5.0.50
>       Latest version installed: 5.0.50
>       Homepage: http://www.macromedia.com
>       Description: Macromedia Shockwave Flash Player
> 
> The only plugin that doesn't work for me is java, except when building from
> source of course. But I am talking of mozilla 1.0 (-r3) there.
> 
> So mozilla 1.0-r3+netscape-flash 5.0.50 seem rock solid to me... 

Wierd... works fine under mozilla, but crashes with a "relocation" error
when I access flash.com from galeon 1.2.6.  /me goes to rebuild galeon
to see if that's the problem.

alan

-- 
Alan "Arcterex" <alan@ufies.org>   -=][=-   http://arcterex.net
"I used to herd dairy cows. Now I herd lusers. Apart from the isolation, I
think I preferred the cows. They were better conversation, easier to milk, and
if they annoyed me enough, I could shoot them and eat them." -Rodger Donaldson

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Tony Clark]

On Thursday 17 October 2002 07.59, Alan wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:19:41AM +0200, Pierre-Henri Jondot wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:30:53 +0200
> >
> > Spider <spider@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > begin  quote
> > > On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:27:19 +0200
> > >
> > > Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> wrote:
> > > > I've narrowed things down a little...well a lot i guess, unmerge
> > > > netscape-flash and Mozilla doesn't crash, emerge it back in and it
> > > > crashes again on the same site.
> > > >
> > > > tony
> > >
> > > a quick guess, you now use gcc 3.x ??  gcc 3.x causes flash to crash
> > > with moz/netscape due to the brokenness of flash.
> > >
> > > //Spider
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > I am lucky then... I never had a problem with flash, either when I was
> > using gentoo 1.2, 1.3b and now 1.4_rc1.
> >
> >
> > *  net-www/netscape-flash
> >       Latest version available: 5.0.50
> >       Latest version installed: 5.0.50
> >       Homepage: http://www.macromedia.com
> >       Description: Macromedia Shockwave Flash Player
> >
> > The only plugin that doesn't work for me is java, except when building
> > from source of course. But I am talking of mozilla 1.0 (-r3) there.
> >
> > So mozilla 1.0-r3+netscape-flash 5.0.50 seem rock solid to me...
>
> Wierd... works fine under mozilla, but crashes with a "relocation" error
> when I access flash.com from galeon 1.2.6.  /me goes to rebuild galeon
> to see if that's the problem.
>
> alan
Thats the same kind of error I am getting from mozilla.  A bit of strace
writev(2, [{"/usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin", 28}, {": ", 2}, {"relocation 
error", 16}, {": ", 2}, {"/opt/netscape/plugins/libflashpl"..., 39}, {": ", 
2}, {"undefined symbol: __builtin_vec_"..., 35}, {"", 0}, {"", 0}, {"\n", 
1}], 10/usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin: relocation error: 
/opt/netscape/plugins/libflashplayer.so: undefined symbol: __builtin_vec_new
) = 125
_exit(127)

-- 
Contract ASIC and FPGA design.
Telephone
+46 702 894 667

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Matthew Kennedy]

Pierre-Henri Jondot <Pierre-Henri.Jondot@wanadoo.fr> writes:

> I am lucky then... I never had a problem with flash, either when I was using
> gentoo 1.2, 1.3b and now 1.4_rc1.
> 
>  
> *  net-www/netscape-flash
>       Latest version available: 5.0.50
>       Latest version installed: 5.0.50
>       Homepage: http://www.macromedia.com
>       Description: Macromedia Shockwave Flash Player
> 
> The only plugin that doesn't work for me is java, except when building from
> source of course. But I am talking of mozilla 1.0 (-r3) there.
> 
> So mozilla 1.0-r3+netscape-flash 5.0.50 seem rock solid to me... 

My guess is you still have the gcc2.95.3 libs installed even after you
upgraded. The people bellow this node in the thread don't.

-- 
Matthew Kennedy
Gentoo Linux Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Pierre-Henri Jondot]

On 17 Oct 2002 08:45:11 -0500
Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Pierre-Henri Jondot <Pierre-Henri.Jondot@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> 
> > So mozilla 1.0-r3+netscape-flash 5.0.50 seem rock solid to me... 
> 
> My guess is you still have the gcc2.95.3 libs installed even after you
> upgraded. The people bellow this node in the thread don't.
> 
Certainly not. I'm talking of a fresh gentoo 1.4_rc1 install. No gcc <3
library there.

-- 
Pierre-Henri Jondot <Pierre-Henri.Jondot@wanadoo.fr>
Page perso : http://perso.wanadoo.fr/phj

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Pierre-Henri Jondot]

On 17 Oct 2002 08:45:11 -0500
Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Pierre-Henri Jondot <Pierre-Henri.Jondot@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> 
> > So mozilla 1.0-r3+netscape-flash 5.0.50 seem rock solid to me... 
> 
> My guess is you still have the gcc2.95.3 libs installed even after you
> upgraded. The people bellow this node in the thread don't.
> 
Certainly not. I'm talking of a fresh gentoo 1.4_rc1 install. No gcc <3
library there.

-- 
Pierre-Henri Jondot <Pierre-Henri.Jondot@wanadoo.fr>
Page perso : http://perso.wanadoo.fr/phj

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Tony Clark]

On Thursday 17 October 2002 18.33, Pierre-Henri Jondot wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2002 08:45:11 -0500
>
> Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Pierre-Henri Jondot <Pierre-Henri.Jondot@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> > > So mozilla 1.0-r3+netscape-flash 5.0.50 seem rock solid to me...
> >
> > My guess is you still have the gcc2.95.3 libs installed even after you
> > upgraded. The people bellow this node in the thread don't.
>
> Certainly not. I'm talking of a fresh gentoo 1.4_rc1 install. No gcc <3
> library there.

That makes me feel a little better knowing I am not alone.  GCC2 has been no 
where near this drive.  I fdisked it and mke2fs on the weekend prior to 
installing 1.4-rc1.  What I get is
tony@power flash-0.4.10 $ /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library 
/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so [/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so: undefined 
symbol: __dso_handle]


-- 
Contract ASIC and FPGA design.
Telephone
+46 702 894 667

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Matthew Kennedy]

Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> writes:

> >
> > Certainly not. I'm talking of a fresh gentoo 1.4_rc1 install. No gcc <3
> > library there.
> 
> That makes me feel a little better knowing I am not alone.  GCC2 has been no 
> where near this drive.  I fdisked it and mke2fs on the weekend prior to 
> installing 1.4-rc1.  What I get is
> tony@power flash-0.4.10 $ /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin
> LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library 
> /opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so [/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so: undefined 
> symbol: __dso_handle]

Okay, so what we have here is one fresh 1.4_rc1 install with
netscape-flash and mozilla working "solid" and another fresh 1.4_rc1
install with netscape-flash and mozilla broken?

-- 
Matthew Kennedy
Gentoo Linux Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Tony Clark]

On Thursday 17 October 2002 19.04, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> writes:
> > > Certainly not. I'm talking of a fresh gentoo 1.4_rc1 install. No gcc <3
> > > library there.
> >
> > That makes me feel a little better knowing I am not alone.  GCC2 has been
> > no where near this drive.  I fdisked it and mke2fs on the weekend prior
> > to installing 1.4-rc1.  What I get is
> > tony@power flash-0.4.10 $ /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin
> > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
> > /opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so [/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so:
> > undefined symbol: __dso_handle]
>
> Okay, so what we have here is one fresh 1.4_rc1 install with
> netscape-flash and mozilla working "solid" and another fresh 1.4_rc1
> install with netscape-flash and mozilla broken?

I'm a little confused I must admit.  I had flash working with moz1.0.0  I 
upgraded to moz1.0.1 and flash broke.  I am not sure if was gplflash or 
macromedia working with moz1.0.0.  Neither works with moz1.0.1.  Macromedia 
causes moz to crash and burn where as gplflash crashes.  I'm not sure if this 
means anything but macromedia does work with konqueror.

tony

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Simonics Zsolt]

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:36:52PM +0200, Tony Clark wrote:
> 
> I'm a little confused I must admit.  I had flash working with moz1.0.0  I 
> upgraded to moz1.0.1 and flash broke.  I am not sure if was gplflash or 
> macromedia working with moz1.0.0.  Neither works with moz1.0.1.  Macromedia 
> causes moz to crash and burn where as gplflash crashes.  I'm not sure if this 
> means anything but macromedia does work with konqueror.

There is a patch in mozilla-1.0-r3.ebuild:

       if [ "${ARCH}" = "x86" ] ; then
        patch -p0 < ${FILESDIR}/${P}-abi-compat-wrappers.patch
        fi

wich is missing from 1.0.1 ebuild. If I copy this line into 1.0.1 and
compile, then flash works again.

(sorry for my terrible English)

-- 
Simca
simc@chello.hu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Pierre-Henri Jondot]

O
> 
> I'm a little confused I must admit.  I had flash working with moz1.0.0  I 
> upgraded to moz1.0.1 and flash broke.  I am not sure if was gplflash or 
> macromedia working with moz1.0.0.  Neither works with moz1.0.1.

I didn't say a word about mozilla 1.0.1 btw... I only wrote that
1.0-r3+macromedia had no issue on my system. And it did work for you too it
seems... 

Perhaps didn't you unmerge properly the old mozilla ? Or perhaps is there
really an issue with mozilla 1.0.1 and flash plugin. That I can't say,
having not tested it.

-- 
Pierre-Henri Jondot <Pierre-Henri.Jondot@wanadoo.fr>
Page perso : http://perso.wanadoo.fr/phj

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[whoracle]

On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:36:52 +0200
Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> wrote:

create a file and name it libc++mem.c
then use your favourite editor add these lines into the file:

void *__builtin_new(int size) {return (void*)malloc(size);}
void *__builtin_vec_new(int size) {return __builtin_new(size);}
void *__builtin_delete(void *ptr) {free(ptr);}
void *__builtin_vec_delete(void *ptr) {__builtin_delete(ptr);} 

save and compile with  

gcc -shared -fPIC -o libc++mem.so libc++mem.c

copy the libc++mem.so to /usr/lib/mozilla and restart mozilla


> On Thursday 17 October 2002 19.04, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> > Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> writes:
> > > > Certainly not. I'm talking of a fresh gentoo 1.4_rc1 install. No gcc <3
> > > > library there.
> > >
> > > That makes me feel a little better knowing I am not alone.  GCC2 has been
> > > no where near this drive.  I fdisked it and mke2fs on the weekend prior
> > > to installing 1.4-rc1.  What I get is
> > > tony@power flash-0.4.10 $ /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin
> > > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
> > > /opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so [/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so:
> > > undefined symbol: __dso_handle]
> >
> > Okay, so what we have here is one fresh 1.4_rc1 install with
> > netscape-flash and mozilla working "solid" and another fresh 1.4_rc1
> > install with netscape-flash and mozilla broken?
> 
> I'm a little confused I must admit.  I had flash working with moz1.0.0  I 
> upgraded to moz1.0.1 and flash broke.  I am not sure if was gplflash or 
> macromedia working with moz1.0.0.  Neither works with moz1.0.1.  Macromedia 
> causes moz to crash and burn where as gplflash crashes.  I'm not sure if this 
> means anything but macromedia does work with konqueror.
> 
> tony
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 and flash

[Tony Clark]

Tried your thing below but it didn't help.  compiles ok and doesn't seem to 
hurt anything.  I also tried

There is a patch in mozilla-1.0-r3.ebuild:

       if [ "${ARCH}" = "x86" ] ; then
        patch -p0 < ${FILESDIR}/${P}-abi-compat-wrappers.patch
        fi

and that didn't help either. 

My USE flags are
 USE="X -gtk2 -gtk gnome -alsa -esd"

I don't know why I put in "gnome" but I have built it before without that 
anyway.

What I have established is macromedia flash works with Mozilla 1.0.  gplflash 
works with neither and bombs out on loading with this.

LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library 
/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so [/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so: undefined 
symbol: __dso_handle]

Macromedia flash works with konq.

Mozilla 1.0.1 crashes with macromedia flash when loading flash files.

I am never going to do emerge -u world ever again...promise :) 

tony



On Thursday 17 October 2002 22.22, whoracle wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:36:52 +0200
> Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> wrote:
>
> create a file and name it libc++mem.c
> then use your favourite editor add these lines into the file:
>
> void *__builtin_new(int size) {return (void*)malloc(size);}
> void *__builtin_vec_new(int size) {return __builtin_new(size);}
> void *__builtin_delete(void *ptr) {free(ptr);}
> void *__builtin_vec_delete(void *ptr) {__builtin_delete(ptr);}
>
> save and compile with
>
> gcc -shared -fPIC -o libc++mem.so libc++mem.c
>
> copy the libc++mem.so to /usr/lib/mozilla and restart mozilla
>

-- 
Contract ASIC and FPGA design.
Telephone
+46 702 894 667

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Peter Ruskin]

On Thursday 17 Oct 2002 18:36, Tony Clark wrote:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 19.04, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> > Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> writes:
> > > > Certainly not. I'm talking of a fresh gentoo 1.4_rc1 install.
> > > > No gcc <3 library there.
> > >
> > > That makes me feel a little better knowing I am not alone.  GCC2
> > > has been no where near this drive.  I fdisked it and mke2fs on
> > > the weekend prior to installing 1.4-rc1.  What I get is
> > > tony@power flash-0.4.10 $ /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin
> > > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
> > > /opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so
> > > [/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so: undefined symbol:
> > > __dso_handle]
> >
> > Okay, so what we have here is one fresh 1.4_rc1 install with
> > netscape-flash and mozilla working "solid" and another fresh
> > 1.4_rc1 install with netscape-flash and mozilla broken?
>
> I'm a little confused I must admit.  I had flash working with
> moz1.0.0  I upgraded to moz1.0.1 and flash broke.  I am not sure if
> was gplflash or macromedia working with moz1.0.0.  Neither works with
> moz1.0.1.  Macromedia causes moz to crash and burn where as gplflash
> crashes.  I'm not sure if this means anything but macromedia does
> work with konqueror.
>
> tony
>
I'm confused too now :-)  I have 1.4beta, gcc-3.2, moz-1.1 (compiled 
with gcc-2.95.3 as per Paul de Vrieze's bugzilla #9016).  gplflash 
didn't segfault, built OK but moz, konqui etc. couldn't see it so I got 
rid of it.  netscape-flash (Macromedia) works well in moz-1.1 but not 
in konqueror.  However, if I try to open a *.swf file from the file 
menu on moz, nothing happens.  That worked on my 1.2 box - useful for 
saving flash files from madblast.com

Peter
-- 
Gentoo Linux 1.4 (Portage 2.0.40).  KDE: 3.0.4  Qt: 3.0.5
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+ 512MB.	Kernel: 2.4.19-win4lin.	GCC 3.2
Linux user #275590 (http://counter.li.org/).  up 5:20.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Spider]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 736 bytes --]

begin  quote
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:36:52 +0200
Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> wrote:

> I'm a little confused I must admit.  I had flash working with moz1.0.0
>  I 
> upgraded to moz1.0.1 and flash broke.  I am not sure if was gplflash
> or macromedia working with moz1.0.0.  Neither works with moz1.0.1. 
> Macromedia causes moz to crash and burn where as gplflash crashes. 
> I'm not sure if this means anything but macromedia does work with
> konqueror.


hm, quick question:
does either of you have USE="gtk2" enabled?   might be an interface
problem with mozilla gtk2 mode..

//Spider

--
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[David Shepard]

Add me to the list of people who had a working Mozilla before upgrading.
Mozilla has worked fine for many weeks, with the only caveat being
incompatibility with the various JREs. Now, I can't even have ten tabs
open without Mozilla crashing. ;-) I think the solution for me is to
just "downgrade" back to the stable Mozilla, once I figure out how to do
that... Any suggestions?

--David


On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 13:36, Tony Clark wrote:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 19.04, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> > Tony Clark <tclark@telia.com> writes:
> > > > Certainly not. I'm talking of a fresh gentoo 1.4_rc1 install. No gcc <3
> > > > library there.
> > >
> > > That makes me feel a little better knowing I am not alone.  GCC2 has been
> > > no where near this drive.  I fdisked it and mke2fs on the weekend prior
> > > to installing 1.4-rc1.  What I get is
> > > tony@power flash-0.4.10 $ /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin
> > > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
> > > /opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so [/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so:
> > > undefined symbol: __dso_handle]
> >
> > Okay, so what we have here is one fresh 1.4_rc1 install with
> > netscape-flash and mozilla working "solid" and another fresh 1.4_rc1
> > install with netscape-flash and mozilla broken?
> 
> I'm a little confused I must admit.  I had flash working with moz1.0.0  I 
> upgraded to moz1.0.1 and flash broke.  I am not sure if was gplflash or 
> macromedia working with moz1.0.0.  Neither works with moz1.0.1.  Macromedia 
> causes moz to crash and burn where as gplflash crashes.  I'm not sure if this 
> means anything but macromedia does work with konqueror.
> 
> tony
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[Andreas Kotowicz]

Just wanted to add my experience on this topic:

netscape-flash runs without any problems on a fresh gentoo 1.4-rc1
install as long as there's no java installed. recently I compiled java
from scratch and webpages having flash code made mozilla crash. I first
thought that it was an java issue, but removing the flash plugin made
the website load ok (except for ne flash animations). so I installed
flash again and removed java. flash works. btw: I hope you didn't get
the impression that my java is broken. it works just fine, I didn't have
a single applet crashing yet.


maybe this helps
andreas