From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_REJECT, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mf1.bredband.net (pop01.lab.bredband.com [195.54.122.119]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1773CABAE5; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:36:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from power ([213.114.163.161]) by mf1.bredband.net with ESMTP id <20021017173657.JSRU5133.mf1@power>; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:36:57 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Tony Clark Reply-To: tclark@bredband.net To: Matthew Kennedy Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!! Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:36:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Pierre-Henri Jondot , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200210162312.53538.tclark@telia.com> <200210171855.58826.tclark@telia.com> <877kgh6lp4.fsf@gentoo.shacknet.nu> In-Reply-To: <877kgh6lp4.fsf@gentoo.shacknet.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200210171923.38732.tclark@bredband.net> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: daa00f16-749e-43f7-aec7-ecbb219a72e8 X-Archives-Hash: 33acf9dc0b8352e927c8fa9bc9fc6486 On Thursday 17 October 2002 19.04, Matthew Kennedy wrote: > Tony Clark writes: > > > Certainly not. I'm talking of a fresh gentoo 1.4_rc1 install. No gc= c <3 > > > library there. > > > > That makes me feel a little better knowing I am not alone. GCC2 has = been > > no where near this drive. I fdisked it and mke2fs on the weekend pri= or > > to installing 1.4-rc1. What I get is > > tony@power flash-0.4.10 $ /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin > > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library > > /opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so [/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so: > > undefined symbol: __dso_handle] > > Okay, so what we have here is one fresh 1.4_rc1 install with > netscape-flash and mozilla working "solid" and another fresh 1.4_rc1 > install with netscape-flash and mozilla broken? I'm a little confused I must admit. I had flash working with moz1.0.0 I= =20 upgraded to moz1.0.1 and flash broke. I am not sure if was gplflash or=20 macromedia working with moz1.0.0. Neither works with moz1.0.1. Macromed= ia=20 causes moz to crash and burn where as gplflash crashes. I'm not sure if = this=20 means anything but macromedia does work with konqueror. tony