From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_REJECT, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mail7-sh.home.nl (mail7.home.nl [213.51.128.26]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB33ABB5A for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 10:18:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.12.101] ([217.120.48.246]) by mail7-sh.home.nl (InterMail vM.5.01.05.09 201-253-122-126-109-20020611) with ESMTP id <20021013151848.HQPX6307.mail7-sh.home.nl@[192.168.12.101]> for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 17:18:48 +0200 From: Rigo Ketelings Organization: rogi.biz To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masking question - READ THIS ! Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:53:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.7 References: <158480000.1034514686@wildsau.local.wg> In-Reply-To: <158480000.1034514686@wildsau.local.wg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200210131653.41040.rigo@home.nl> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: c3a4e608-08bf-48a4-a684-b5500a7164b1 X-Archives-Hash: 6d83f986241d1a7e7adc621207ee65cf I did a work around for the sandboxing on ethereal 0.9.7, its now masked for testing using new arch testing keywords. I'm gonna close this out could u=20 please resubmit me the correct kismet ebuild :). BTW here are the=20 instructions for unmasking arch testing keywords: Another important snippet. If you want to unmask all ~x86 KEYWORDSed ebuilds, add the following to your /etc/make.conf: ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=3D"~x86" ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is incremental like USE so it *will* keep the existing "x86" that is defined in your profile. This can also be done using the environment for temporary testing purposes: # export ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=3D"~x86" (or "~ppc" or "~sparc", etc.) Rigo On Sunday 13 October 2002 15:11, Rolf Offermanns wrote: > Can anyone help me with the following? > > When I do an emerge -s flex, I get > * sys-devel/flex > Latest version available: 2.5.4a-r4 > Latest version installed: 2.5.4a-r4 > Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/flex/flex.html > Description: GNU lexical analyser generator > > There is an -r5 ebuild in the portage dir. and this version is not masked, > so why isn't it listed in the search? > > Almost the same with the xfree-4.2.1.ebuild. This one is masked but if I > unmask it, I still get the 4.2.0-r12 version listed. > > When i try to give the 4.2.1 ebuild on the emerge command line I get the > following: > These are the packages that I would merge, in order. > > Calculating dependencies | > > emerge: all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=3Dsys-devel/flex-2.5.4a-r5" (fr= om > ebuild / x11-base/xfree-4.2.1 merge) have been masked. > > I am confused. What does that mean and where is it masked? > > -Rolf