From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fred@vanandel.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from vanandel.dyndns.org (h24-87-145-2.vs.shawcable.net [24.87.145.2])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F20ABB4F
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue,  1 Oct 2002 10:20:25 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from vanandel.net (s216-232-59-193.bc.hsia.telus.net [216.232.59.193])
	by vanandel.dyndns.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id g91FKO115855
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:20:24 -0700
From: Fred Van Andel <fred@vanandel.net>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:20:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] install problems
In-Reply-To: <200210010821.10187.tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com>
References: <20020930151930.93205900.fred@vanandel.net> <200210010821.10187.tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com>
Message-Id: <20021001082024.2E47E620.fred@vanandel.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: nPOP Ver 1.0.0
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 65984da4-d339-404d-9605-7cd075ad338d
X-Archives-Hash: 3ec41dc995e715281e632783429e6090

Toby Dickenson <tdickenson@geminidataloggers.com> wrote:
(10/01/2002 00:21)

>On Monday 30 Sep 2002 11:19 pm, Fred Van Andel wrote:
>
>> Since the signal was generated by grsecurity (??), have you tried
>> recompiling the kernel without grsecurity included?
>
>Not generated by grsecurity.. It was generated elsewhere and logged by 
>grsecurity.


Grsecurity does not always play nice with the rest of the system. I 
still suggest that you recompile the kernel without it.  If the 
problem goes away then you should try the grsecurity options as given 
in http://gentoo.org/doc/gentoo-security.html and experement from 
there.

Fred Van Andel