From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN, DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from mailnews.kub.nl (mailnews.kub.nl [137.56.0.220]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6BDAC51A for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:25:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.sub.devrieze.net (gt0416.kub.nl [137.56.97.162]) by mailnews.kub.nl (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g8QIPivA023368 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 20:25:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pavlvs1.local.devrieze.net (pavlvs1.local.devrieze.net [192.168.1.1]) by mail.sub.devrieze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49C4992 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 20:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper Gentoo Name (was License criteria for Gentoo) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 20:25:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200209260923.47896.pauldv@cs.kun.nl> <1033050742.21349.2.camel@ppc.artshouse.com> In-Reply-To: <1033050742.21349.2.camel@ppc.artshouse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200209262025.43243.pauldv@cs.kun.nl> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 1ae7b69c-e9ad-411d-beb5-cd5d6155d7bd X-Archives-Hash: 6429bce1d79e3e542dffb484087e43ee On Thursday 26 September 2002 16:32, Mark Guertin wrote: > > Not true at all, Gentoo is also the whole init system (scripting and > tmpfs sides), try doing env-update or rc-update add sshd default on > another distro. > Of course that is also what defines a distribution although I could imagi= ne=20 gentoo providing different profiles that have for example different init=20 scripts or other architecture changes. That would be gentoo to the extrem= e. > There is a lot more to Gentoo than portage or the ebuilds we supply for > users. It is unlike any of the RedHat or the knockoffs (Mandrake, etc) > in that Gentoo actually brought something _new_ to the table, and it wa= s > more than a little something. You are right. Gentoo brought flexibility and power (for the user and the= =20 system) Paul --=20 Paul de Vrieze Junior Researcher Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net