public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Bainbridge <C.J.Bainbridge@ed.ac.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Cc: verwilst@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr/portage/distfiles/ name collisions
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:55:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209251555.29757.C.J.Bainbridge@ed.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200209251629.17610.verwilst@gentoo.org>

On Wednesday 25 September 2002 15:29, you wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 September 2002 16:09, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> || Twice in the last two days I've had to deal with packaging distribution
> || files that have source URIs with the same basenames (eg. I have two
> || packages that pull in examples.tar.gz, and a package that gets released
> || to a version directory like ${PV}/package.tar.gz). Portage gets
> || confused, thinks I already have the file, then fails the checksum. Is
> || there any way to override the fetch behaviour in an ebuild, eg. to
> || record the full uri like
> || /usr/portage/distfiles/http://... ?
>
> No, you should report the packages that have those same versionless names
> to our bugzilla, so the dev can change the name of the package (adding a
> version or something), and put it on ibiblio directly.
>
> Thanks!

These are ebuilds that I was writing myself, they haven't been added to 
ebuilds cvs yet. One is proprietory and couldn't be redistributed on ibiblio 
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8312). Any solution here?

Oh and I just discovered about adding stuff to /etc/env.d.. the ebuilds I've 
looked at seem to use xxpacakge for the name, does the xx mean anything or do 
we just start at 00 and work our way up?


  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-25 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-22 15:55 [gentoo-dev] License criteria for Gentoo Richard Stallman
2002-09-22 21:34 ` Mikko Moilanen
2002-09-22 21:51   ` Peter Ruskin
2002-09-24 17:05     ` Mikko Moilanen
2002-09-22 21:59 ` Evan Read
2002-09-22 22:28 ` Christian Axelsson
2002-09-23  1:21 ` mike
2002-09-23  4:00   ` Mark Bainter
2002-09-24 10:19     ` Thomas M. Beaudry
2002-09-24 10:42       ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-24 12:24       ` Mark Bainter
2002-09-24 13:50         ` Christophe Vanfleteren
2002-09-24 14:23           ` Mark Bainter
2002-09-24 14:49             ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-23  4:20 ` Greg Corcoran
2002-09-23  0:42   ` Mark Guertin
2002-09-23  7:25   ` Evan Read
2002-09-24 10:30   ` Thomas M. Beaudry
2002-09-24 10:49     ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-24 11:37       ` Kevyn Shortell
2002-09-24 12:03         ` Cal Evans
2002-09-24 12:35         ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-24 14:19           ` Mark Bainter
2002-09-24 14:49             ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-24 15:15               ` Mark Bainter
2002-09-24 16:10                 ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-24 16:24                   ` Mikko Moilanen
2018-09-25 10:03           ` Karan
2002-09-25  0:58             ` [gentoo-dev] ANN: Proposed Fix for Gentoo (GNU/)Linux Issue Drew Whittle
2002-09-25  7:08             ` [gentoo-dev] License criteria for Gentoo Henti Smith
2002-09-25 10:12               ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-24 22:27         ` Greg Corcoran
2002-09-24 22:50           ` Kevyn Shortell
2002-09-25  5:56             ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-25  6:33               ` Kevyn Shortell
2002-09-25 10:09                 ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-26  0:12             ` Greg Corcoran
2002-09-25 10:03               ` Giulio Eulisse
2002-09-25  8:47           ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-25 10:21             ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-25 11:35               ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-25 11:58                 ` [gentoo-dev] Proper Gentoo Name (was License criteria for Gentoo) Greg Corcoran
2002-09-25 12:12                   ` Mark Bainter
2002-09-25 12:26                   ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-25 13:04                     ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-25 13:44                       ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-25 14:29                         ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-25 18:37                           ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-25 14:09                       ` [gentoo-dev] /usr/portage/distfiles/ name collisions Chris Bainbridge
2002-09-25 14:29                         ` Bart Verwilst
2002-09-25 14:55                           ` Chris Bainbridge [this message]
2002-09-25 12:53                   ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Proper Gentoo Name (was License criteria for Gentoo) Moritz Schulte
2002-09-25 13:38                     ` Greg Corcoran
2002-09-25 14:01                   ` [gentoo-dev] " wes chow
2002-09-25 14:17                     ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-25 14:09                       ` wes chow
2002-09-25 19:07                         ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-26  1:45                         ` Evan Read
2002-09-25 19:05                     ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-25 19:35                       ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-26  7:21                         ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-25 19:57                       ` wes chow
2002-09-26  7:23                         ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-26 14:32                           ` Mark Guertin
2002-09-26 18:25                             ` Paul de Vrieze
2002-09-23  7:47 ` [gentoo-dev] License criteria for Gentoo Benj
2002-09-23 13:21   ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-24 19:53 ` Spider
2002-09-24 21:03   ` Kevyn Shortell
2002-09-24 22:29     ` Moritz Schulte
2002-09-25  0:21     ` Ryan Shaw
2002-09-25  0:29       ` Kevyn Shortell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200209251555.29757.C.J.Bainbridge@ed.ac.uk \
    --to=c.j.bainbridge@ed.ac.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=verwilst@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox